2018
DOI: 10.4314/jfas.v9i2s.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air quality modelling using chemometric techniques

Abstract: The datasets of air quality parameters for three years (2012 the result of three different groups of similarity based on the characteristics of air quality parameters. DA shows all seven paramet the most significant variables after stepwise backward mode. PCA identifies the major sour of air pollution is due to combustion of fossil fuels in motor vehicles and industrial activities. The ANN model shows a better prediction compared to the MLR model with R2 values equal to 0.819 and 0.773 respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANN and MLR are the common technique practices and widely applied as the prediction or forecasting tools in multidiscipline, including atmospheric studies (Azid et al 2017). The main difference between ANN and MLR is ANN has the capability to solve the complexity of non-linearity of environmental dataset.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANN and MLR are the common technique practices and widely applied as the prediction or forecasting tools in multidiscipline, including atmospheric studies (Azid et al 2017). The main difference between ANN and MLR is ANN has the capability to solve the complexity of non-linearity of environmental dataset.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters were chosen based on our previous study [11,17], as they could give great influence on the performance and physicochemical properties of the prepared catalyst. The model was trained by using the Levenberg Marquardt Learning Algorithm [14,18]. The respected R 2 and RMSE were computed using Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range calculation for R 2 is in between 0.0−1.0. The lowermost value of R 2 is considered weak, whilst the highest value (near to 1.0) indicates suitability to be chosen as the best predictor [18]. Next, the efficiency model (EM) by Nash and Sutcliffe [19] was used to test the fit between measured and modelled data using the Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%