1994
DOI: 10.1029/94jd00964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air truth validation of cloud albedo estimated from NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer data

Abstract: A comparison was carried out between cloud albedos observed in situ by aircraft and cloud albedos calculated with visible optical thickness retrieved from the NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer channel 1 radiance data. The results show that the observed and calculated cloud albedos in the visible region are coincident with each other in a few percent for both homogeneous stratus and rather inhomogeneous stratocumulus clouds as long as the cloud amount is large. In the nearinfrared region, on the oth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In situ measurements from aircraft can give instantaneous cloud albedo estimates, but are limited in space, time, and viewing angle. Such estimates vary widely within as well as between experiments, ranging from 0.1 to 0.9, with an average around 0.4-0.5 (see, e.g., Robinson 1958;Griggs 1968;Salomonson and Marlatt 1968;Hayasaka et al 1994;Peng et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In situ measurements from aircraft can give instantaneous cloud albedo estimates, but are limited in space, time, and viewing angle. Such estimates vary widely within as well as between experiments, ranging from 0.1 to 0.9, with an average around 0.4-0.5 (see, e.g., Robinson 1958;Griggs 1968;Salomonson and Marlatt 1968;Hayasaka et al 1994;Peng et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The cloud optical thickness has properties similar to the rainfall rate; therefore, it was compared to surface shortwave irradiance obtained by pyranometer (Hayasaka and Iwabuchi 2001). A distribution of transmittance in cloudy atmosphere is well expressed by the normal (Gaussian) function in time and space because the cloud optical thickness can be expressed with lognormal distribution (Hayasaka et al 1994). We have not directly investigated the consistency of the probability density distribution for month-long periods in a space of 280 km by 280 km; however, the above discussion suggests that the analysis performed in this study is reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation not only confirms the accuracy and precision of the satellite-sensor products but also provides several clues for their advancement. Many attempts to validate the cloud properties observed from space have been published (e.g., Hayasaka et al 1994;Nakajima and Nakajima 1995;Kuji et al 2000;Kawamoto et al 2001;Dong et al 2002;Nakajima et al 2005;Painemal and Zuidema 2011;King et al 2013). Most of these studies validated the water cloud products of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor onboard the TERRA and AQUA satellites, usually over relatively short time periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%