Airborne LiDAR Intensity Correction Based on a New Method for Incidence Angle Correction for Improving Land-Cover Classification

Abstract

Light detection and range (LiDAR) intensity is an important feature describing the characteristics of a target. The direct use of original intensity values has limitations for users, because the same objects may have different spectra, while different objects may have similar spectra in the overlapping regions of airborne LiDAR intensity data. The incidence angle and range constitute the geometric configuration of the airborne measurement system, which has an important influence on the LiDAR intensity. Considering positional shift and rotation angle deviation of the laser scanner and the inertial measurement unit (IMU), a new method for calculating the incident angle is presented based on the rigorous geometric measurement model for airborne LiDAR. The improved approach was applied to experimental intensity data of two forms from a RIEGL laser scanner system mounted on a manned aerial platform. The results showed that the variation coefficient of the intensity values after correction in homogeneous regions is lower than that obtained before correction. The overall classification accuracy of the corrected intensity data of the first form (amplitude) is significantly improved by 30.01%, and the overall classification accuracy of the corrected intensity data of second form (reflectance) increased by 18.21%. The results suggest that the correction method is applicable to other airborne LiDAR systems. Corrected intensity values can be better used for classification, especially in more refined target recognition scenarios, such as road mark extraction and forest monitoring. This study provides useful guidance for the development of future LiDAR data processing systems.

Remote Detection of Geothermal Alteration Using Airborne Light Detection and Ranging Return Intensity

“…At the wavelengths of both LiDAR scanners, targets with strong alteration reflect the most energy of the scanner's laser beam of all the samples. The difference in return intensity between the two platforms is likely related to the increased complexity of airborne acquisition, e.g., atmospheric absorption [17,20,[33][34][35][36][37][38]. Since our laboratory data are collected from a short distance and perpendicular to the general sample surface, this represents the target reflectivity [27].…”

“…Although the quality of LiDAR data depends on the point density, which is influenced by several factors of acquisition settings [15,16], LiDAR data can generate raster data with its finest ground sampling distance (GSD). For instance, the point density of 8 points/m 2 (e.g., in [17]) is equivalent to a GSD of ±0.3 m.…”

Assessing Debris Flow Risk at a Catchment Scale for an Economic Decision Based on the LiDAR DEM and Numerical Simulation

“…Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors can generate highresolution three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of objects. Height information (that is Z values) can be used to characterize the topography of an area (Wu et al, 2021). The Chengbei Gully is not a large-scale area; therefore, a high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) is important for subsequent simulations.…”