54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-0999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne observations of an asteroid entry for high fidelity modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important component of any effort to characterize hazardous objects approaching Earth relies on ground-based lightcurve photometry, useful to determine the rotational period of the body, which in turn may provide another clue on its 2 It is important to point out that, due to the moderately steep incident angle of ∼ 20°, WT1190F behaved far more like an asteroid than a man-made spacecraft in its atmosphere re-entry. The object actually approached Earth at a 10.6 km s −1 velocity, thus crossing our atmosphere in some ∼ 10 s (Jenniskens et al, 2016). As consequence of the limited aerodynamic drag interval the true impact point should have expected to be earlier along the track than predicted by a purely ballistic model, but not too significantly so.…”
Section: Ligthcurve Observationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another important component of any effort to characterize hazardous objects approaching Earth relies on ground-based lightcurve photometry, useful to determine the rotational period of the body, which in turn may provide another clue on its 2 It is important to point out that, due to the moderately steep incident angle of ∼ 20°, WT1190F behaved far more like an asteroid than a man-made spacecraft in its atmosphere re-entry. The object actually approached Earth at a 10.6 km s −1 velocity, thus crossing our atmosphere in some ∼ 10 s (Jenniskens et al, 2016). As consequence of the limited aerodynamic drag interval the true impact point should have expected to be earlier along the track than predicted by a purely ballistic model, but not too significantly so.…”
Section: Ligthcurve Observationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is just worth stressing here that a fast-spinning body could more likely survive the atmosphere entry event allowing heat to be more easily dissipated, such as to avoid (or limit) any body disruption/fragmentation. These arguments actually led Jenniskens et al (2016) to conclude that about two thirds of WT1190F's entire mass may have safely arrived at the ground, impacting the sea still at supersonic speed.…”
Section: Ligthcurve Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These observed entries provide test cases for the comparison of molecular radiation (Jenniskens et al. 2016; Loehle et al. 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The object WT1190F was a piece of space debris which returned to Earth on an eccentric orbit with an entry speed of 10.61 km s −1 at an entry angle of 20.6◦ (Jenniskens et al. 2016). These entry conditions are more similar to asteroid impacts than most usual space debris impacts from typically low Earth orbits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%