2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne radioiodine in northern Serbia from Fukushima

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Radionuclides released from the FDNA have been detected across the globe [ Bikit et al ., ; Evrard et al ., ; Landis et al ., ; Macmullin et al ., ; Melgunov et al ., ; Piñero García and Ferro García , ; Wetherbee et al ., ]. These radionuclides were transported primarily in the atmosphere and deposited by both dry deposition and washout [ Wetherbee et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Radionuclides released from the FDNA have been detected across the globe [ Bikit et al ., ; Evrard et al ., ; Landis et al ., ; Macmullin et al ., ; Melgunov et al ., ; Piñero García and Ferro García , ; Wetherbee et al ., ]. These radionuclides were transported primarily in the atmosphere and deposited by both dry deposition and washout [ Wetherbee et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comparing published results of contamination monitoring after Fukushima accident obtained in Serbia [27] and in neighbouring regions [28,29] which are up to 2.7±0.1 mBq m -3 in Serbia [27], in Greece 0.497 mBq m -3 [28] and 1.2 mBq m -3 in Austria [29] it may be concluded that the influence of routine emissions from a nuclear facility is the most significant exposure scenario in chronic exposure situations. Comparing published results of contamination monitoring after Fukushima accident obtained in Serbia [27] and in neighbouring regions [28,29] which are up to 2.7±0.1 mBq m -3 in Serbia [27], in Greece 0.497 mBq m -3 [28] and 1.2 mBq m -3 in Austria [29] it may be concluded that the influence of routine emissions from a nuclear facility is the most significant exposure scenario in chronic exposure situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, traces of the volcanic clouds could also be detected in the stratosphere over Western Siberia [9]. In March-April 2011, due to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Japan), radioactive materials were transported in the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean [13][14][15] causing measurable concentration even in Europe [16][17][18] within a few weeks in several countries like Greece [19], Germany [20], and Serbia [21]. In April 2015 the plumes from the Calbuco volcano in Chile rising to 15-23 km height [22,23] reached Argentina and Uruguay [24] and influenced even the development of the Antarctic ozone hole in 2015 [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%