Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs) and medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs),The shaping of T-cell repertoire that is immunocompetent (i.e. useful for self-defense) and self-tolerant (i.e. harmless to the body) is crucial for the development and maintenance of the immune system. Thymic epithelial cells (TECs), which are the major component of the thymic microenvironments, are essential for the generation and repertoire formation of T cells. The thymic cortex, which induces early T-cell development and the positive selection of functionally competent T cells, is characterized by a subset of TECs termed cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs), whereas the thymic medulla, which establishes self-tolerance in T cells by the negative selection of self-reactive T cells and the generation of regulatory T cells, is formed by another subset of TECs termed medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). TECs are derived from the endodermal epithelium of the third pharyngeal pouch, and the transcription factor Foxn1 is required Correspondence: Prof. Yousuke Takahama e-mail: takahama@genome.tokushima-u.ac.jp for their generation [1]. The early TECs generated during embryogenesis contain bipotent progenitor thymic epithelial cells (pTECs) that are capable of generating both cTECs and mTECs [2,3]. It is acknowledged that thymocyte development differentially affects cTEC development [4][5][6] and mTEC development [7,8]. However, how pTECs branch into cTECs and mTECs and what regulates their developmental pathways are not fully understood.Several molecular markers that characterize cTECs and mTECs have been identified. For example, cTECs predominantly express keratin 8 (K8), CD205 (DEC205), and CD249 (Ly51), whereas mTECs highly express keratin 5 (K5), CD80, and molecules that bind to the lectin Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (UEA1) [9][10][11]. In addition, mTECs, including immature mTECs, strongly express the tight junction molecules claudin-3 and claudin-4 [12]. Molecules that define pTECs are less well known, although it was suggested that pTECs express Plet1 (MTS24) and doubly express K5 and K8 [9,13]. cTECs and mTECs have further been characterized by their expression of functional molecules. DLL4 and IL-7, whichwww.eji-journal.eu Eur. J. Immunol. 2014. 44: 2872-2875 HIGHLIGHTS 2873are important for the induction of early T-cell development, as well as the thymoproteasome subunit β5t and the serine proteasome Prss16, which are critical for the positive selection of developing thymocytes, are highly expressed by cTECs rather than mTECs [10,11]. The cytokine receptor RANK and the nuclear protein Aire, which are pivotal for mTEC development and function in establishing self-tolerance in T cells, are predominantly detectable in mTECs rather than cTECs [10,11]. Chemokines, which essentially regulate the migration of developing thymocytes, are also unequally expressed between cTECs and mTECs; CCL25 and CXCL12 are more abundant in cTECs than mTECs, whereas CCL19, CCL21, and XCL1 are more highly detectable in mTECs than cTECs [...
Cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs) and medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs),The shaping of T-cell repertoire that is immunocompetent (i.e. useful for self-defense) and self-tolerant (i.e. harmless to the body) is crucial for the development and maintenance of the immune system. Thymic epithelial cells (TECs), which are the major component of the thymic microenvironments, are essential for the generation and repertoire formation of T cells. The thymic cortex, which induces early T-cell development and the positive selection of functionally competent T cells, is characterized by a subset of TECs termed cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs), whereas the thymic medulla, which establishes self-tolerance in T cells by the negative selection of self-reactive T cells and the generation of regulatory T cells, is formed by another subset of TECs termed medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs). TECs are derived from the endodermal epithelium of the third pharyngeal pouch, and the transcription factor Foxn1 is required Correspondence: Prof. Yousuke Takahama e-mail: takahama@genome.tokushima-u.ac.jp for their generation [1]. The early TECs generated during embryogenesis contain bipotent progenitor thymic epithelial cells (pTECs) that are capable of generating both cTECs and mTECs [2,3]. It is acknowledged that thymocyte development differentially affects cTEC development [4][5][6] and mTEC development [7,8]. However, how pTECs branch into cTECs and mTECs and what regulates their developmental pathways are not fully understood.Several molecular markers that characterize cTECs and mTECs have been identified. For example, cTECs predominantly express keratin 8 (K8), CD205 (DEC205), and CD249 (Ly51), whereas mTECs highly express keratin 5 (K5), CD80, and molecules that bind to the lectin Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (UEA1) [9][10][11]. In addition, mTECs, including immature mTECs, strongly express the tight junction molecules claudin-3 and claudin-4 [12]. Molecules that define pTECs are less well known, although it was suggested that pTECs express Plet1 (MTS24) and doubly express K5 and K8 [9,13]. cTECs and mTECs have further been characterized by their expression of functional molecules. DLL4 and IL-7, whichwww.eji-journal.eu Eur. J. Immunol. 2014. 44: 2872-2875 HIGHLIGHTS 2873are important for the induction of early T-cell development, as well as the thymoproteasome subunit β5t and the serine proteasome Prss16, which are critical for the positive selection of developing thymocytes, are highly expressed by cTECs rather than mTECs [10,11]. The cytokine receptor RANK and the nuclear protein Aire, which are pivotal for mTEC development and function in establishing self-tolerance in T cells, are predominantly detectable in mTECs rather than cTECs [10,11]. Chemokines, which essentially regulate the migration of developing thymocytes, are also unequally expressed between cTECs and mTECs; CCL25 and CXCL12 are more abundant in cTECs than mTECs, whereas CCL19, CCL21, and XCL1 are more highly detectable in mTECs than cTECs [...
The thymus is the major site of T‐lymphocyte production. Nonlymphoid elements, referred to as the thymic stroma, create the thymic microenvironment required to govern differentiation, maturation and tolerance induction of haematopoietic precursors into immune‐competent, nonautoreactive T cells. Thymic epithelial cells (TECs) are integral to thymopoiesis but are affected by ageing. From the onset of puberty, a proportional imbalance of TEC subpopulations coincides with a dramatic numerical loss of developing T cells. By middle‐age numerical loss of TECs accompanies further loss of thymocytes. Ongoing functional impediment of bipotent thymic epithelial progenitor cells (TEPC) has been proposed as one possible underlying cause and is more apparent in males. As such, endogenous recovery following thymic damage, such as from chemotherapy, in middle‐aged males relies heavily on proliferation of residual immature and mature TECs than through homeostatic differentiation of bipotent TEPC evident in middle‐aged females. Various strategies have been proposed to enhance thymus recovery following cytoablative therapies; however, thus far, temporary suppression of sex hormone production appears to have the most wide‐ranging impact on enhancing mature TEC replenishment and thymopoiesis. Key Concepts Thymic epithelial cells are critical for T cell development. Single‐cell transcriptomics and mapping identified more TEC subsets than first realised. Mature thymic medullary epithelial cells are essential for the presentation of self‐antigens for central tolerance induction. During age‐related thymus involution, an imbalance in TEC subsets accompanies the numerical loss of developing T cells from the onset of puberty. Postnatal bipotent thymic epithelial progenitor cells (TEPC) undergo functional attenuation from puberty with sexual dimorphism apparent. Increased reliance on activation and proliferation of enduring single‐lineage cortical and medullary TEC precursors for mature TEC maintenance during ageing. Thymic damage induces homeostatic TEC replenishment via bipotent TEPC in middle‐aged females but is restricted to proliferation and differentiation of single lineage progenitors in middle‐aged males. Temporary suppression of sex hormone production as a strategy for thymus regeneration releases the postpubertal TEPC functional block in males. Therapeutic strategies with clinical potential include adoptive transfer of in vitro generated progenitor T cells, exogenous administration of cytokines and growth factors, and temporary sex steroid inhibition.
Thymic epithelial cells (TECs) provide key instructive signals for T-cell differentiation. Thymic cortical (cTECs) and medullary (mTECs) epithelial cells constitute two functionally distinct microenvironments for T-cell development, which derive from a common bipotent TEC progenitor. While seminal studies have partially elucidated events downstream of bipotent TECs in relation to the emergence of mTECs and their progenitors, the control and timing of the emergence of the cTEC lineage, particularly in relation to that of mTEC progenitors, has remained elusive. In this review, we describe distinct models that explain cTEC/mTEC lineage divergence from common bipotent progenitors. In particular, we summarize recent studies in mice providing evidence that mTECs, including the auto-immune regulator+ subset, derive from progenitors initially endowed with phenotypic properties typically associated with the cTEC lineage. These observations support a novel “serial progression” model of TEC development, in which progenitors serially acquire cTEC lineage markers, prior to their commitment to the mTEC differentiation pathway. Gaining a better understanding of the phenotypic properties of early stages in TEC progenitor development should help in determining the mechanisms regulating cTEC/mTEC lineage development, and in strategies aimed at thymus reconstitution involving TEC therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.