2023
DOI: 10.1002/fld.5192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airfoil inverse design based on laminar compressible adjoint lattice Boltzmann method

Abstract: A new optimization techniques based on the adjoint lattice Boltzmann method is derived for airfoil inverse design in laminar compressible flows. In this study, the developed adjoint lattice Boltzmann scheme based on the circular function (CF) is extended for airfoil inverse design problems in laminar incompressible and compressible flows. New mathematical derivation based on compressible lattice Boltzmann equations (LBE) is developed which can find target shape of an airfoil with available desired pressure dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the present scheme allows to embed an arbitrary complex geometry in a Cartesian grid system by employing the level-set function. In addition, existing shape/topology optimization schemes [51]- [53] combining LBM and the density-based method are typically limited to a subsonic regime. This is because, LBM has inherent problems in solving compressible flows at high Mach numbers, and the density-based method cannot clearly define the fluid-solid interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, the present scheme allows to embed an arbitrary complex geometry in a Cartesian grid system by employing the level-set function. In addition, existing shape/topology optimization schemes [51]- [53] combining LBM and the density-based method are typically limited to a subsonic regime. This is because, LBM has inherent problems in solving compressible flows at high Mach numbers, and the density-based method cannot clearly define the fluid-solid interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the previous studies still rely on body-fitted meshes, they need to regenerate computational meshes after the shape is updated in each forward-adjoint iteration. To avoid the bottlenecks of mesh generation, the continuous adjoint methods combined with lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) have also been developed [51]- [53]. However, since LBM is originally established based on the low Mach number assumption [54], their applications are limited to subsonic regimes (Ma < 0.8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%