2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-1025-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airfoil shape optimization using improved Multiobjective Territorial Particle Swarm algorithm with the objective of improving stall characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morris et al (2014), Nejat et al (2014), and Su et al (2015) have showed the shape of curves for different values of N 1 and N 2 . They also claimed that when describing an airfoil, the values we normally use are N 1 =0.5 and N 2 =1.…”
Section: Parameterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Morris et al (2014), Nejat et al (2014), and Su et al (2015) have showed the shape of curves for different values of N 1 and N 2 . They also claimed that when describing an airfoil, the values we normally use are N 1 =0.5 and N 2 =1.…”
Section: Parameterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Non-gradient-based numerical optimization methods, such as genetic algorithms, are generally not as efficient as gradientbased methods. However, gradient-based methods require a design space free from discontinuity as the derivatives have to be recalculated as the search progresses (Nejat et al, 2014). Further, when a problem is multimodal, gradient-based methods will fail to find solutions beyond the local best result close to the start point.…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Wang et al [27] introduced a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for bi-directional functionally graded plates. In [22], a modified Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) method was presented to tackle a shape optimization issue within an aerodynamics context. Ge et al [11] proposed a multiobjective genetic algorithm to address shape design problem in tube bank modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, many notable approaches and applications have been proposed regarding multiobjective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO). For example, MOPSO's application for solving the problems of multi-objective optimization (Panda and Pani, 2016;Zhang et al, 2014), using running proximity for particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based multi-objective optimization (Nasir et al, 2012;Sheikholeslami and Navimipour, 2017;Yuguang et al, 2016), automatic clustering using multi-objective immunized PSO (Nanda and Panda, 2013;Sheikholeslami and Navimipour, 2017), a multi-objective chaotic PSO for environmental/ financial transmission (Cai et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2012), a developed territorial particle swarm optimization algorithm (Nejat et al, 2014;Sheikholeslami and Navimipour, 2017), using throng, transition and authority for improving PSO-based multi-objective optimization (Sierra and Coello, 2005), multi-objective produce optimization of compound manufacturing using quantum-behaved PSO (Fang et al, 2017;Li et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2017;Omkar et al, 2009) and using strength Pareto evolutionary Algorithm-2 based MOPSO for designing electrical dispensation systems joining sectionalizing tie-lines and substitutes (Davins-Valldaura et al, 2017;Sheikholeslami and Navimipour, 2017). Also, a new IJPCC 16,2 algorithm, named fuzzy-based MOPSO has been proposed in (Zhang and Xing, 2010) to solve timecostquality tradeoff problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%