2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2007.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airfoil shape parameterization for optimum Navier–Stokes design with genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though often overly simplistic in representation (conventionally two-or three-dimensional plots), fitness landscapes have become crucial in terms of our understanding of how an evolving population will behave relative to a static fitness function. The fitness function itself describes a property which will dictate selection; this could plausibly be enzyme activity or specificity in the case of protein evolution, or a measure of drag in the design of airfoils in a 'real life' evolutionary optimization problem (Shahrokhi & Jahangirian 2007). Commonly, the evolving population is envisaged as a single hill-climber; an algorithm which crosses the landscape by accepting only genetic modifications (single-point mutations) that result in an improvement in fitness (Kauffman & Levin 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though often overly simplistic in representation (conventionally two-or three-dimensional plots), fitness landscapes have become crucial in terms of our understanding of how an evolving population will behave relative to a static fitness function. The fitness function itself describes a property which will dictate selection; this could plausibly be enzyme activity or specificity in the case of protein evolution, or a measure of drag in the design of airfoils in a 'real life' evolutionary optimization problem (Shahrokhi & Jahangirian 2007). Commonly, the evolving population is envisaged as a single hill-climber; an algorithm which crosses the landscape by accepting only genetic modifications (single-point mutations) that result in an improvement in fitness (Kauffman & Levin 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The manual effort required in such design studies can be considerably reduced by employing modern design automation and optimization techniques and there are, of course, numerous examples of such techniques being applied throughout the literature. Aerofoil sections [1,2], compressor blades [3], wings [4], aircraft [5], combustors [6][7][8] and whole engines [9,10], for example, have all been the subject of automated design optimizations in recent years. However, the majority of engineering design optimization examples within the literature include a fundamental limitation which can limit the benefits that such automation can bring to real world problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the boundary values of the input parameters have widespread orders. For example, the domain of changes for the rst PARSEC parameter (r LE ) is [0.006-0.0115] where the domain of the fth parameter ( TE ) is [0][1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This causes the e ects of the higherorder parameters to be much more than those of the lower-order parameters during the training process.…”
Section: Pre-processing the Training Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundaries are introduced in Section 6 for airfoil shape optimization. More information about PARSEC parameterization can be found in reference [6]. Thus, the genetic algorithm starts with a collection of chromosomes and generates new chromosomes from previously generated members using GA operators.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Optimization With Gamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation