Airport Operations, Safety, and Emergency Management

Price, Jeffrey C.; Forrest, Jeffrey S.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800515-6.00001-9

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…SMS as a management instrument makes use of proactive components on safety performance, with a focus on the process and the identification of the risks of reducing the components [10]. The Federal Aviation Administration, on the other hand, regards SMS as a formal, top-down business-like approach to risk management [11].…”

Section: Theoretical Framework 21 Safety Management Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Dematel) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Safety Management System Evaluation Performance

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to improve airport safety management system (SMS) performance, an evaluation system is required to improve on current shortcomings and maximize safety. This study suggests the integration of the DEMATEL and ANP methods in decision making processes by analyzing causal relations between the relevant criteria and taking effective analysis-based decision. The DEMATEL method builds on the ANP method in identifying the interdependencies between criteria. The input data consists of questionnaire data obtained online and then stored in an online database. Furthermore, the questionnaire data is processed using DEMATEL and ANP methods to obtain the results of determining the relationship between criteria and criteria that need to be evaluated. The study cases on this evaluation system were Adi Sutjipto International Airport, Yogyakarta (JOG); Ahmad Yani International Airport, Semarang (SRG); and Adi Sumarmo International Airport, Surakarta (SOC). The integration grades SMS performance criterion weights in a descending order as follow: safety and destination policy, safety risk management, healthcare, and safety awareness. Sturges' formula classified the results into nine grades. JOG and SMG airports were in grade 8, while SOG airport was in grade 7.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Framework 21 Safety Management Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Measuring element weights. Calculation of the priority vector value w is the eigen vector, uses equation(11).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Dematel) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Safety Management System Evaluation Performance

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ILS delivers enough information _ accurate so the pilot can do it landing in everything condition weather (Gates, 2023). This really helps the airport in doing so the service , so activity Then cross Air can flow safely and smoothly (Price & Forrest, 2016). There are three components of information from ILS system , namely : Localizer Transmitter as a guide right / left from axis / base , Glide Slope Transmitter as a guide corner landing on the axis runway (Veneruso et al, 2023).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of The Effect of Maintenance and Calibration Against Localizer Equipment Performance

Fatonah,

Kurnianingsih,

Jaya

2023

SLJIL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To support aviation safety, equipment facilities are needed that are able to provide information, guidance, and signs so that aircraft are safe from the time they take off until they land. So that the risk of landing failure can be minimized, equipment is needed that can guide aircraft to land correctly and safely (Supriyadi, 2012). One of the navigation aids is the Instrument Landing System (ILS). An instrument Landing System (ILS) is an instrument landing tool (non-visual) that assists pilots in carrying out aircraft approach and landing procedures at an airport. ILS provides information that is accurate enough so that pilots can make landings in all weather conditions. This really helps airports in carrying out their services, so that air traffic activities can run safely and smoothly. There are three information components of the ILS system, namely: Localizer Transmitter as a guide to the right/left of the runway axis/axle, Glide Slope Transmitter as a guide to the landing angle on the runway axis. Marker Beacon (Inner, Middle, Outer Marker Beacon) which is located at a certain distance from the threshold as a horizontal distance guide to the runway threshold. In aviation navigation services, Localizer equipment must be ready to operate and maintained, so maintenance and reporting procedures are required which have been stipulated in the Guidelines for Maintenance and Reporting of Aviation Electronics and Electrical Facilities Equipment. Apart from maintenance, navigation aids require calibration to ensure that the performance of the Localizer navigation aids is in good condition and can provide a good angle for landing in accordance with the provisions of the Instructions and Procedures for Carrying Out Calibration of Flight Facilities and Procedures. The method used in this research is a quantitative method. Based on the results of the F test, all independent variables, namely maintenance, and calibration, simultaneously or together influence the performance of the localizer equipment. This is proven by the calculated F result of 24.403 > F table 3.18 and a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05.

show abstract

Emergency Management Simulation Practices with Problem Based Learning Method in Air Traffic Control Training: Theoretic Approach

Turhan

Açikel

Güneş

2020

Journal of Aviation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu makalenin amacı, akademik olarak uygulanan probleme dayalı öğrenme (PDÖ) ve havacılık çevresindeki simülasyonlu acil durum eğitiminin (SADE) benzer yönlerini ortaya koymak ve hava trafik kontrolörü eğitimi performansını geliştirebilecek öneriler geliştirmektir. Bu amaçla probleme dayalı öğrenme hakkında bilgi verilmiş ve karşılaştırmalı olarak hava trafik kontrolörü yetiştirmede simülasyonlu acil durum eğitimi uygulama süreçleri ele alınmıştır. PDÖ ve SADE arasında senaryolarla probleme dayalı çözümlerin geliştirilmesi, öğrencilerin sorumluluk almaları, öğrencilerin cesaretlendirilmesi, gerçek olaylardan seçilen acil durumların öğrenciye direkt olarak bilgi verilmeden çözülmesinin istenmesi gibi benzerlikler ve destekleyici yönler bulunmaktadır. Acil durumlarda hava trafik kontrolörlerinin rollerinden hareketle PDÖ ve SADE uygulamalarının birlikte ele alınmasının geçerli ve güvenilir yöntem kullanımı gibi potansiyel faydaları tartışılmıştır. Hava trafik kontrolörlerinin acil durum görevlerinin simülasyonu hakkında bilgiler verilmiştir. Son olarak, hava trafik yönetiminde acil durum eğitimi için sonuç ve öneriler verilmiştir. Bu çalışmada gerçekleştirilen karşılaştırmalı yaklaşım ile eğitim alanında sistemli şekilde gerçekleştirilen uygulamaların havacılık operatörlerinin yetiştirilmesinde daha yaygın ve etkin bir şekilde temel alınması vurgulanmaktadır.

show abstract

Airport Operations, Safety, and Emergency Management

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Dematel) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Safety Management System Evaluation Performance

The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Dematel) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) for Safety Management System Evaluation Performance

Analysis of The Effect of Maintenance and Calibration Against Localizer Equipment Performance

Emergency Management Simulation Practices with Problem Based Learning Method in Air Traffic Control Training: Theoretic Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About