2018
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201705-0989oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: APRV, as a primary ventilation strategy in children with ARDS, was associated with a trend toward higher mortality compared with the conventional LoTV. Limitations should be considered while interpreting these results. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02167698) and Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2014/06/004677).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ganesan et al conducted an RCT using APRV and examined children under 12 years old with ARDS who had been intubated for less than 72 h and were randomized to receive either standard LVt strategy or APRV [94]. Unlike the Zhou trial, the APRV arm performed significantly worse, necessitating early trial termination.…”
Section: Analysis Of Recent Rcts Using the Aprv Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganesan et al conducted an RCT using APRV and examined children under 12 years old with ARDS who had been intubated for less than 72 h and were randomized to receive either standard LVt strategy or APRV [94]. Unlike the Zhou trial, the APRV arm performed significantly worse, necessitating early trial termination.…”
Section: Analysis Of Recent Rcts Using the Aprv Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lalgudi Ganesan et al (2018) conducted an RCT in children with ARDS, who were randomized to receive either standard LVt strategy or APRV. The APRV group was shown not to be lung protective, and the trial was terminated early.…”
Section: The Tcav Methods To Open and Stabilize The Acutely Injured Lungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the VT in the TCAV protocol is personalised and adaptive. One randomised controlled trial [99] sought to impose LVT (6-7 cc•kg −1 ) to patients on APRV (APRV-LVT) and found that there was a higher mortality as compared with standard LVT ventilation Another three-armed study [100] aimed at comparing LVT with APRV-LVT and TCAV revealed no significant difference between the three groups in terms of oxygenation or mortality, with the main flaw of the study being that it was limited by power. In addition, the authors reported concerns regarding measured release volumes of >8 cc•kg −1 in the APRV and APRV-LVT groups, but made no mention of the driving pressure or compliance [100].…”
Section: Aprv Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%