2019
DOI: 10.25000/acem.578444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Akne vulgaris hastalarının değerlendirilmesi için hangi yaşam kalite ölçeği kullanılmalıdır? CADI ya da DYKİ? Bir prospektif çalışma

Abstract: Aim: Acne vulgaris is one of the most common diseases that affects quality of life. While the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is the most frequently used life quality index for dermatologic disorders, the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) is an acne-spesific quality of life scale. The aim of this study was to determine which scale should be more appropriate and practical to evaluate the quality of life in acne patients and to compare the differences between two scales. Methods: Acne scores of 273 pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the results of a recent study which stated that treatment to reduce the number and size of acne vulgaris lesions could improve their quality of life by Matsuoka et al showed that the use of skin care and cosmetics for female patients with acne can affect the patient's quality of life effectively. 24,25 The study about EGCG as and adjuvant and compared with tretinoin was never conducted before, so the researcher has minimal literature in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the results of a recent study which stated that treatment to reduce the number and size of acne vulgaris lesions could improve their quality of life by Matsuoka et al showed that the use of skin care and cosmetics for female patients with acne can affect the patient's quality of life effectively. 24,25 The study about EGCG as and adjuvant and compared with tretinoin was never conducted before, so the researcher has minimal literature in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%