2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-24760-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Akzeptanz und Konflikte als Zustände regionaler sozialer Prozesse. Anwendung eines transdisziplinären Analyserahmens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the expansion of renewable energies receives broad social approval in central Europe [1], but often encounters resistance at the local level [2]. Regarding the increasingly urgent expansion -especially of integrated PV systems such as AgriVoltaics (Agri-PV)challenges such as private-sector willingness to invest and tolerance of landscape changes must be borne by society as a whole [3]. The reasons for the discrepancy between a general social acceptance of the energy transition and a very specific, negative attitude towards the local expansion of renewable energies are manifold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the expansion of renewable energies receives broad social approval in central Europe [1], but often encounters resistance at the local level [2]. Regarding the increasingly urgent expansion -especially of integrated PV systems such as AgriVoltaics (Agri-PV)challenges such as private-sector willingness to invest and tolerance of landscape changes must be borne by society as a whole [3]. The reasons for the discrepancy between a general social acceptance of the energy transition and a very specific, negative attitude towards the local expansion of renewable energies are manifold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Ergebnisdarstellung wird durch typische Nutzerkommentare illustriert. Die Ergebnisse wurden in Anlehnung anGölz, Langer, Becker et al (2019) in Profilkarten erfasst. In den Karten werden links Items gelistet, rechts wird die Relevanz dieser Punkte per Stakeholdergruppe angezeigt, gemessen an der Anzahl von Nennungen (dunkelgrau: relevant, Item wird von ein bis drei Personen genannt; dunkelgrau mit Punkt: hoch relevant, Item wird von vier und mehr Personen angesprochen; weiß: keine Relevanz).…”
unclassified