Akzeptanzbedingungen politischer Maßnahmen für die Verkehrswende: Das Fallbeispiel Berliner Mobilitätsgesetz

Becker, Sophia; Renn, Ortwin

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-24760-7_6

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most recently, starting with Berlin, bottom-up initiatives have been emerging in more and more cities. Initiated by these new actors, legally binding acts now specify high quality standards and wide coverage of the cycle infrastructure for the near future [49].…”

Section: Area Under Investigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Cyclists’ Route Preferences with Respect to Infrastructure

Hardinghaus

Papantoniou

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Providing a sufficiently appropriate route environment is crucial to ensuring fair and safe biking, thus encouraging cycling as a sustainable mode of transport. At the same time, better understanding of cyclists’ preferences regarding the features of their routes and their infrastructure requirements is fundamental to evaluating improvement of the current infrastructure or the development of new infrastructure. The present study has two objectives. The first is to investigate cyclists’ route preferences by means of a choice experiment based on a stated preference survey. Subsequently, the second objective is to compare cyclist preferences in two countries with different cycling characteristics (both in infrastructure as well as cyclists’ behavior). For this purpose, a graphical online stated preferences survey was conducted in Greece and Germany. Within the framework of statistical analyses, multinomial mixed logit discrete choice models were developed that allow us to quantify the trade-offs of interest, while distinguishing between the preferences of different user groups. In addition, user requirements in Greece, as a country with a low cycling share and very little dedicated bike infrastructure, were compared to the requirements in Germany, where cycling is popular and the infrastructure is well developed. The results over the whole sample indicate that subgroups value infrastructure differently according to their specific needs. When looking at country specifics, users from Greece are significantly more willing to accept longer travel times in return for higher-quality facilities. The utility of low speed limits in mixed traffic is also different. In Germany, low speed limits offset the disturbance caused by motorized traffic, but in Greece they do not. Consequently, the results help to asses which types of infrastructure are most sustainable from a user perspective and help to set priorities when the aim is to adapt the road infrastructure efficiently in a stable strategy.

show abstract

Section: Area Under Investigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating Cyclists’ Route Preferences with Respect to Infrastructure

Hardinghaus

Papantoniou

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In Germany, although 81 per cent of the German population ages 18 to 67 favour a Verkehrswende towards sustainable mobility [ 11 ], it is not always clear what measures are necessary to achieve the transition this support refers to. The term "Verkehrswende" or lately "Mobilitätswende" came up to address and capture the transition of (1) the transport mode ( Verkehr ) and (2) mobility as a need ( Mobilität ) [ 12 ]. Both concepts can be understood as "socio-technical transformation processes in the transport sector to greatly reduce the environmental and health impacts caused by traffic to enable the sustainable development of this sector" [ 13 ] (p.110).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The term "Verkehrswende" or lately "Mobilitätswende" came up to address and capture the transition of (1) the transport mode (Verkehr) and (2) mobility as a need (Mobilität) [12]. Both concepts can be understood as "socio-technical transformation processes in the transport sector to greatly reduce the environmental and health impacts caused by traffic to enable the sustainable development of this sector" [13] (p.110). 1 In public discourse, however, the terms are not used distinctly.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Applying the Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) on socio-technical transitions, paired with the interdisciplinary framing approach, this paper investigates how incumbent actors of automobility in Germany framed the issue of a "transition of mobility and transport" ("Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende") in their public communication in 2020. We first identified representatives of industry, science, policy, and media, since the Verkehrs/Mobilitätswende and its implementation measures are contested among these actors. Employing qualitative content analysis, we then screened 325 public documents according to the elements of the framing approach problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. Results Findings show that most of the actors frame a transformation of transport and mobility as a necessity. Their arguments encompass environmental and climate-related issues as well as infrastructural problems for bikes and public transport caused by the hegemony of automobility. The actors propose a variety of solutions, primarily focusing on technical innovations for cars or on the expansion of different infrastructures to achieve a modal shift towards sustainable mobility. Conclusion This paper demonstrates that there is no common understanding of the problems and solutions to foster a mobility transition, as the diversity of problems and solutions proposed within the frame elements is high and complicates the prevailing implementation gap of the mobility transition. Therefore, MLP should be conceptually and methodologically bridged with the interdisciplinary framing approach, particularly with regard to the transition of mobility and transport.

show abstract

Social Acceptance of CAD in Japan and Germany: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Insights

Fleischer,

Taniguchi,

Schippl

et al. 2024

Acceptance and Diffusion of Connected and Automated Driving in Japan and Germany

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is widely acknowledged that social acceptance of automated vehicles (AVs) is a crucial factor for the future development and deployment of the technology in mobility systems. In general, mobility systems are sociotechnical systems. Their design and development depend on a multitude of technical and non-technical factors, including aspects of public or social acceptance. However, as will be shown in this chapter, social acceptance can have different meanings and can be addressed by various approaches. Different objects of acceptance (e.g. trust in robots, AVs as a useful means of transport etc.) as well as different subjects of acceptance (users, citizens, industrial interest groups etc.) can be distinguished. In addition, the subjects can be in different relationships to the objects (use, approval, protest etc.). Against this backdrop, we start this chapter with an in-depth conceptualization of social acceptance. Following this, we present empirical material that sheds lights on different dimensions of acceptance. We draw on two surveys carried out in Japan and Germany in recent years. The surveys provide insights on relevant public perceptions and attitudes towards AVs, and make it clear that not only public perceptions but also the views and attitudes of many other actors are relevant for acceptance and diffusion of AVs. To give an additional perspective on this topic, we provide insights on media reporting on AVs in Japan and Germany.

show abstract

Akzeptanzbedingungen politischer Maßnahmen für die Verkehrswende: Das Fallbeispiel Berliner Mobilitätsgesetz

Cited by 6 publications

References 21 publications

Evaluating Cyclists’ Route Preferences with Respect to Infrastructure

Evaluating Cyclists’ Route Preferences with Respect to Infrastructure

Framing the mobility transition: public communication of industry, science, media, and politics in Germany

Social Acceptance of CAD in Japan and Germany: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Insights

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About