1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(98)00057-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Al adatom migration from the H-terminated to the bare area on Si(111) surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…our structure f ) is our lowest energy structure followed by the H 3 adsorbed site (cf. structure g ) as also found previously in the literature. ,,, The difference between the two structures is found to be 0.82 eV, in agreement with the value of Illas et al of 0.81 eV at CI/DZP level of theory. Other theoretical studies applying band structure calculations, DFT cluster calculations, and MP2 found the difference to be around 0.2−0.3 eV, while, band structure calculations with the Car−Parrinello method calculated the difference at 0.56 eV .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…our structure f ) is our lowest energy structure followed by the H 3 adsorbed site (cf. structure g ) as also found previously in the literature. ,,, The difference between the two structures is found to be 0.82 eV, in agreement with the value of Illas et al of 0.81 eV at CI/DZP level of theory. Other theoretical studies applying band structure calculations, DFT cluster calculations, and MP2 found the difference to be around 0.2−0.3 eV, while, band structure calculations with the Car−Parrinello method calculated the difference at 0.56 eV .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There are many experimental and theoretical studies (mostly band structure calculations) on the adsorption of group IIIA, i.e., B, Al, Ga, ,, and In ,,,, on Si(111) surface, concerning the geometric and electronic structure, the surface changes associated with metal diffusion on the surface, the growth of group IIIA films on Si(111), and the properties induced by the adsorption of M on the Si(111) surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,[9][10][11] It is commonly argued that the mobility of the adsorbed metal adatoms is enhanced on the H-terminated Si͑111͒ surface compared to that on the clean Si͑111͒ surface. 4,12 Scanning-tunneling microscopy ͑STM͒ studies showed that the mobility of the metal adatoms between the half-unit cells ͑HUC's͒ of Si͑111͒ 7 ϫ 7 is much lower than that inside a HUC. [13][14][15] Recently, another STM study directly determined the Ag adatom barrier for inter-HUC diffusion at 0.93 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%