2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23960-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Al-Coated Conductive Fiber Filters for High-Efficiency Electrostatic Filtration: Effects of Electrical and Fiber Structural Properties

Abstract: Through the direct decomposition of an Al precursor ink AlH3{O(C4H9)2}, we fabricated an Al-coated conductive fiber filter for the efficient electrostatic removal of airborne particles (>99%) with a low pressure drop (~several Pascals). The effects of the electrical and structural properties of the filters were investigated in terms of collection efficiency, pressure drop, and particle deposition behavior. The collection efficiency did not show a significant correlation with the extent of electrical conductivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies, either particles or filters were charged, and so the electrostatic filtration efficiency enhancement was limited. Some researchers installed particle prechargers before conductive filters to strengthen the electrostatic effect. In these studies, the highest filtration efficiency was 99.99% for 0.03–0.4 μm particles with 4.9 Pa pressure drop at 0.1 m/s face air velocity. , However, the electrostatic shielding limits these filters’ dust-holding capacity because there is no electric force inside the conductive filter material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these studies, either particles or filters were charged, and so the electrostatic filtration efficiency enhancement was limited. Some researchers installed particle prechargers before conductive filters to strengthen the electrostatic effect. In these studies, the highest filtration efficiency was 99.99% for 0.03–0.4 μm particles with 4.9 Pa pressure drop at 0.1 m/s face air velocity. , However, the electrostatic shielding limits these filters’ dust-holding capacity because there is no electric force inside the conductive filter material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26−29 In these studies, the highest filtration efficiency was 99.99% for 0.03−0.4 μm particles with 4.9 Pa pressure drop at 0.1 m/s face air velocity. 27,28 However, the electrostatic shielding limits these filters' dust-holding capacity because there is no electric force inside the conductive filter material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework, a combined approach utilizing the electrostatic attraction of ESP and fiber-based filters has been introduced for efficient PM capture. Air ionization and charging of PMs can increase the electrostatic attraction of the particles and thus increase filtration efficiency while circumventing the issue of pressure loss . However, even this hybrid system (combining nanofibers and ESP features) may still suffer from the issues of pressure loss after clogging and poor recyclability when the fiber packing density is high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the diffusion mechanism is increasing with decreasing the particle diameter and becomes less as the aerosol particle size increases. It is similar to the electrostatic particle deposition mechanism [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%