2019
DOI: 10.1111/aae.12131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

al‐Khafaji reinterpreted: New insights on Umm an‐Nar monuments and settlement from Bat, Oman

Abstract: Al‐Khafaji is a central and well‐known point on the early third millennium BC map of the UNESCO World Heritage Site of Bat, in the Sultanate of Oman. For years, Kasr al‐Khafaji (“Tower 1146”) has been understood as an Umm an‐Nar (ca. 2800–2000 BCE) monument standing amid a contemporary village. However, recent excavations by the Bat Archaeological Project (BAP) reveal that the entirety of the known site—monument(s) and settlement—is situated on an anthropogenic clay mound that elevated it meters above the surr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bronze Age towers are widely considered representative of large‐scale settlements (Al‐Jahwari, 2008, 2009; Swerida, 2022). Excavation at tower sites such as Kasr al‐Khafaji (Swerida & Thornton, 2019; Thornton et al, 2013) and al‐Khutm (Cocca & Vinci, 2016) has revealed domestic spaces associated with towers; however, some settlements have no apparent tower (Döpper, 2019; Gentelle & Frifelt, 1989; Schmidt & Döpper, 2014). Although investigations have demonstrated the multiperiodicity of many towers, they are primarily associated with the Umm an‐Nar period sites (Cleuziou & Tosi, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bronze Age towers are widely considered representative of large‐scale settlements (Al‐Jahwari, 2008, 2009; Swerida, 2022). Excavation at tower sites such as Kasr al‐Khafaji (Swerida & Thornton, 2019; Thornton et al, 2013) and al‐Khutm (Cocca & Vinci, 2016) has revealed domestic spaces associated with towers; however, some settlements have no apparent tower (Döpper, 2019; Gentelle & Frifelt, 1989; Schmidt & Döpper, 2014). Although investigations have demonstrated the multiperiodicity of many towers, they are primarily associated with the Umm an‐Nar period sites (Cleuziou & Tosi, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Umm an‐Nar towers range from 16 to 50 m in diameter and vary in terms of location, size and interior layout (Cable & Thornton, 2013). The purpose and function of these structures are widely debated (Harrower et al, 2014; Swerida & Thornton, 2019) and hypotheses include that they served as defensive watch towers (Frifelt, 1975); elevated refugia for locals fleeing violence (Weisgerber, 1981); elite residences (Cleuziou & Tosi, 2007); ritual platforms (Orchard, 1999); and/or were related to water management (Frifelt, 1976, 1985, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include sites such as Hili (Cleuziou, 1989), Bat (Frifelt, 1976(Frifelt, , 1985), al-Khashbah (al-Jahwari & Kennet, 2010Schmidt & Döpper, 2017), Bisya (Orchard & Orchard, 2007), Salut (Degli Esposti, 2014) and several others. Several Umm an-Nar settlements with or without monumental 'towers' have evidence of domestic activities or architecture associated with them (e.g., al-Jahwari et al, 2018;Azzarà, 2018;Cleuziou, 1989;Cleuziou & Tosi, 2020;Döpper, 2018), while others have evidence of other possible functions: as defensive structures to control access to water; symbolic markers in the landscape; or elite residences (Swerida, 2022;Swerida & Thornton, 2019). Despite a renewed interest in the domestic lifeways of inhabitants of settlements (Swerida, 2022), available information on agricultural practices and the management of animals is limited by the poor preservation of archaeobotanical and faunal material (Uerpmann & Uerpmann, 2008;Willcox & Tengberg, 1995).…”
Section: Umm An-nar Settlements and Domestic Lifewaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Late UAN corresponds to Phase 4 of the chronological sequence of UAN tombs at Hili; this phase represents a significant change in funerary customs at the site with the cessation of UAN tomb construction and the introduction of pit‐burials (McSweeney et al, 2008, p. 10). The inland site of Bat also seems to undergo significant changes in the Late UAN, with towers that had been in use since the Hafit period falling out of use and possibly the Settlement Slope area of the site being occupied more intensely (Swerida, 2018, p. 12; Swerida & Thornton, 2019; Thornton & Ghazal, 2016, p. 200). Explanations of the changes witnessed in the Late UAN have often focused on the degree to which exchange and exogenous forces affected SE Arabia at this time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%