The synthesis and characterization of polyhedral boron hydrides [1] and boron subhalides, [2] originally regarded as curios, at a second glance have proved to be a lucky chance for progress in chemistry, as on this basis new concepts of chemical bonding were developed, e. g. the Wade-Mingos rules. [3][4][5][6][7] Two milestones in aluminum-organic chemistry with a polyhedral {Al n }-lattice are [Al 12 R 12 ] 2À (1 2À ) [8] and [Al 4 Cp* 4 ] (2; Cp* = C 5 Me 5 ) [9][10][11] (Figure 1). The polyhedral closo-cluster 1 2À is an exception compared to the common low-valent aluminum and gallium clusters which tend to be so-called metalloid clusters.[12] These are clusters mainly characterized by the fact that the topology of the "naked", that is, non-ligand bearing cluster atoms in the cluster core, in many cases reflects the topology of the atoms found in metals and elements, respectively. [13][14][15] Prior to presenting the results of quantum chemical calculations for some [M 12 X 12 ] and [M 13 X 12 ] (M = B, Al, Ga; X = halide) model compounds, we describe our most recent experimental findings which prompted us to start these investigations: [16] Mass spectrometric examinations of the structurally known metalloid-cluster anion [Ga 13 (GaR À (3 À ). [16][17][18] This anion formed during the stepwise reaction of chlorine in the gas phase and as a result of the cleavage of six GaCl moieties [Eq (1)]. The isomer 3 À , when generated from density functional theory (DFT) calculations is, with its octahedral {Ga 6 } core, 30 kJ mol À1 more stable than the icosahedral molecule with a {Ga 12 } core and 12 terminally bound ligands that would be expected according to Wades rules. Based on these surprising results [16, 19] we have performed DFT calculations to elaborate some fundamental differences between typical Wade clusters in boron chemistry and metalloid clusters in aluminum and gallium chemistry.We have examined neutral and dianionic compounds of the structure [M 12 Cl 12 ] 0,2À (M = B, Al, Ga) to determine which of the two structural patterns (icosahedral M 12 -units or clusters with an M 6 -core) is energetically favored for the particular element. For each species we calculated the isomer with an icosahedral structure and terminally bound ligands (ico) and the isomer with an octahedral core of "naked" metal atoms (hence the term "metalloid" (m)). For the metalloid clusters (m), a protecting shell results consisting of doubly oxidized MX 2 units; the bridging (M-X-M) unit contributes to the stabilization of the cluster. The energetic relations between all isomers are shown in Figure 2. Selected structural parameters of [B 12 Cl 12 ] (4), [B 12 The energy diagram (Figure 2) depicts the differences between boron-, aluminum-, and gallium clusters: The icosahedral species 4 (ico) and 4 2À (ico) are energetically favored by 600 kJ mol À1 and 918 kJ mol À1 , respectively, over the metalloid isomers 4 (m) and 4 2À (m). On the other hand, the neutral metalloid Al and Ga clusters 5 (m) and 6 (m) are,