2010
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alarm substance from adult zebrafish alters early embryonic development in offspring

Abstract: Alarm substances elicit behavioural responses in a wide range of animals but effects on early embryonic development are virtually unknown. Here we investigated whether skin injury-induced alarm substances caused physiological responses in embryos produced by two Danio species ( Danio rerio and Danio albolineatus ). Both species showed more rapid physiological development in the presence of alarm substance, although there were subtle differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This substance is synthesized in the epidermal cells of the fish and then released if there is cell membrane damage, which induces a strong fear response in nearby individuals [ 29 , 52 ]. Whereas new models for the study of fear and anxiety have been developed in larval zebrafish [ 30 , 31 ], only one study has determined the impact of the alarm substance in young stages of this species [ 53 ]. In this study, embryos exposed for 30 minutes displayed higher overall developmental rates compared with non-exposed fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This substance is synthesized in the epidermal cells of the fish and then released if there is cell membrane damage, which induces a strong fear response in nearby individuals [ 29 , 52 ]. Whereas new models for the study of fear and anxiety have been developed in larval zebrafish [ 30 , 31 ], only one study has determined the impact of the alarm substance in young stages of this species [ 53 ]. In this study, embryos exposed for 30 minutes displayed higher overall developmental rates compared with non-exposed fish.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, evolution works on averages, so this will not lead to the ‘best’ outcome for every individual. Nevertheless, conformity may give the chimpanzees the opportunity to acquire information and shape preferences in situations in which it may be difficult or costly to gather the requisite personal information (Henrich & Boyd 1998; Laland 2004; Pike & Laland 2010). Thus it may be a better strategy to rely on observations of one’s groupmates, even when they do not seem to make sense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow-the-majority predicts that, as the number of animals in a group performing a specific behaviour increases, so does the likelihood of a naïve individual adopting that same behaviour, thus driving the preservation of the tradition. Through empirical investigation, such a process, also termed ‘conformist transmission’ (Henrich & Boyd 1998), has been identified in a number of species, including fish (Day et al 2001; Pike & Laland 2010), rats (Chou & Richerson 1992), nonhuman primates (Whiten et al 2005; Perry 2009) and humans (Kameda & Nakanishi 2002). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we know little about variation at different biological levels during development; indeed, variation during development has often been viewed as 'noise' that hampers the investigation of the genetic control of developmental processes (Spicer & Gaston, 1999;. However, an emerging body of evidence is revealing significant intraspecific variation during development, including variation in the timing of developmental events at the individual level (Gomez-Mestre et al, 2008de Jong et al, 2009;Mourabit et al, 2010;Pan & Burggren, 2010;Tills et al, 2011;Tills, Rundle & Spicer, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%