1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-0633(98)00035-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Albedo measurements on meteorite particles fn1 fn1Presented at ACM96, Versailles, 8–12.7.1996. Also University of Pisa, Department of Mathematics, Pisa, Italy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NEATM albedo values for these classes are lower in value than the STM derived albedos. The NEATM albedo range best-matches the spectroscopically inferred compositions of S-and C-class asteroids as suggested by laboratory albedo measurements of ordinary chondrite and carbonaceous chondrite materials (Piironen et al 1998 into the near-IR, could provide a basic taxonomic classification of a newly discovered object reliable enough to obtain an asteroid diameter within ∼ 10%. However, the veracity of this assertion cannot be assessed as asteroids selected for our thermal analysis (Table 1) are sufficiently large enough in size that they would have saturated the SDSS images and are thus not present in their moving target catalog (Ivezić et al 2002).…”
Section: Sparse-sampling Effectssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The NEATM albedo values for these classes are lower in value than the STM derived albedos. The NEATM albedo range best-matches the spectroscopically inferred compositions of S-and C-class asteroids as suggested by laboratory albedo measurements of ordinary chondrite and carbonaceous chondrite materials (Piironen et al 1998 into the near-IR, could provide a basic taxonomic classification of a newly discovered object reliable enough to obtain an asteroid diameter within ∼ 10%. However, the veracity of this assertion cannot be assessed as asteroids selected for our thermal analysis (Table 1) are sufficiently large enough in size that they would have saturated the SDSS images and are thus not present in their moving target catalog (Ivezić et al 2002).…”
Section: Sparse-sampling Effectssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…(3)) be p < 0.2 and that the volume-element single-scattering albedos beω V > 0.5. Such single-scattering albedos are comparable to the corresponding albedos measured in the laboratory for single lunar analog particles large compared to the wavelength (Piironen et al 1998). The geometric-albedo range for the mare regions has been estimated with the help of the study by Lumme & Irvine (1982).…”
Section: Scattering Model For Mare Regionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Piironen et al (1998) determined the single particle albedos of ordinary chondrites and C2 carbonaceous chondrites to be 0.50 ± 0.25 and 0.15 ± 0.02, respectively. Use of the Lumme-Bowell scattering model (Lumme & Bowell 1981) with these values yields geometric albedos of 0.13-0.24 for ordinary chondrites and 0.04-0.07 for carbonaceous chondrites.…”
Section: Comparisons To Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%