Epidemiologic research examines relationships between exposures and outcomes, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes. To affect a change and improve outcomes, the relationships described must not only be causal, but modifiable (1). Numerous studies have described independent associations between AKI and subsequent CKD and mortality (2). The majority of these studies focused on one dimension of AKI, "severity," via the magnitude of peak rise in serum creatinine (2-4). Recently, some investigations have examined long-term outcomes associated with other dimensions of AKI including duration (5) and kidney function after peak (i.e., recovery) (6-8).Pannu and colleagues performed a retrospective analysis of 190,962 Albertans to assess the modifying effect of renal recovery on the relationship between AKI and long-term outcomes (9). They found that participants who did not recover to within 25% of baseline GFR within 90 days of AKI were at higher risk for doubling of creatinine and ESRD, and for all-cause mortality. It is a well done study with several strengths. First, this is a large population-based study with appropriate inclusion/exclusion criteria, which limited selection bias. Participants were required to have serum creatinine measurement within 180 days before, $1 measurement during, and at least one measurement after hospitalization; only those who survived at least 90 days post-AKI were included in the analyses. Second, the AKI definition used for the primary exposure was appropriate (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stage 2). Third, the recovery definition was valid and sound (post-AKI creatinine value within 25% of baseline within 90 days, and sensitivity analyses performed using 10% increments to find the threshold for the association between recovery and outcomes). Finally, the dataset provided sufficient outcomes for robust analyses and multivariable adjustment, and there was adequate length of follow-up (median 3 years).Unlike other studies that have examined the association between reversible AKI and long-term outcomes (6,7), Pannu and colleagues treated reversible AKI (instead of the non-AKI group) as the referent group for their analyses. In the follow-up period, 27% of those who did not experience AKI recovery developed doubling of serum creatinine/ESRD compared with 7.5% in those that recovered (adjusted hazard ratio of approximately 4). These data certainly quantify the public health effect of irreversible AKI in a broad, nonselected population. Because nonrecovery from AKI results in a substantial healthcare burden, these data can help clinicians make plans for follow-up with patients, their primary care providers, and nephrologists after discharge (10).The authors did not make any claims about causality in their paper. Looking forward, however, it is important to determine whether we can affect and improve these outcomes. Reiterating the above, the relationship between the exposure and outcome must be causal in order to modify risk. Are the relationships between AKI and lo...