2019
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol, Age, and Mortality: Estimating Selection Bias Due to Premature Death

Abstract: Alcohol use causes approximately 10% of deaths among adults ages 20-65 in the United States. Although previous research has demonstrated differential age-related risk relationships, it is difficult to estimate the magnitude of selection bias attributable to premature mortality based on existing cohort studies, the average age of which is greater than 50 years. The objective of our study was to assess the distribution of mortality-related harms and benefits from alcohol among adults ages 20 and older in compari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean/median age at baseline was greater than 59 years in most datasets used in our analyses. Because alcohol-related risk is relatively higher among younger people compared with the elderly [ 68 ], enrolling older participants in studies would minimise the risk relationship compared with an analysis that included drinkers of all ages. Notably, with older age of the study participants comes increased likelihood for drinkers to become former drinkers, which might exacerbate the “sick quitters” bias (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean/median age at baseline was greater than 59 years in most datasets used in our analyses. Because alcohol-related risk is relatively higher among younger people compared with the elderly [ 68 ], enrolling older participants in studies would minimise the risk relationship compared with an analysis that included drinkers of all ages. Notably, with older age of the study participants comes increased likelihood for drinkers to become former drinkers, which might exacerbate the “sick quitters” bias (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excess of early peak drinking trajectories among former drinkers in the present study provides support for this hypothesis. Harmful drinking patterns prior to age 35 represent not only an unassessed AMI risk, but also a potential source of selection bias since they may reduce study participation by individuals whose alcohol use has affected their well‐being (Naimi et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irregular heavy drinking patterns, such as binge drinking, are most prevalent during adolescence and emerging adulthood (Lee and Sher, ), a period that may be completely overlooked in cohort studies that assess alcohol intake prospectively in subjects recruited when they are already entering middle age. Given that much alcohol‐related mortality takes place prior to the age at which participants enter most cohort studies, this may bias the enrollment of subjects at risk for alcohol‐related CHD (Naimi et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In younger age groups, alcohol consumption is more likely to be characterized by heavy episodic drinking (HED), which has high (40–45%) prevalence rates among young adolescents (15–24 years old 12 ). In young and middle-aged adults (15–49 years old), alcohol consumption is also a leading risk factor for premature death, whereas other risk factors, such as smoking and high BMI cause greater loss of life among older adults 16 18 . In one study, traffic accidents had a greater proportion of victims with blood alcohol levels > 10 mg/dl for adults 34 years of age and younger, compared to other adult age groups (35–74 years old) 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%