2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70214-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol consumption and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a pooled analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
7
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
90
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, this hierarchical scheme was used. One of the main differences with many other studies using other classifications, is that in the current study PCN (including MM) is included in the group of lymphoid neoplasms, which most studies did not include 6,8,[10][11][12]42,43 The use of different classifications in previous studies, mostly among case-control studies, makes meaningful comparison of results between epidemiological studies very difficult and might explain the observed differences between case-control studies and between case-control and cohort studies. Subjects with baseline information on total ethanol consumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the current study, this hierarchical scheme was used. One of the main differences with many other studies using other classifications, is that in the current study PCN (including MM) is included in the group of lymphoid neoplasms, which most studies did not include 6,8,[10][11][12]42,43 The use of different classifications in previous studies, mostly among case-control studies, makes meaningful comparison of results between epidemiological studies very difficult and might explain the observed differences between case-control studies and between case-control and cohort studies. Subjects with baseline information on total ethanol consumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…14,16,19,30,38,40,42,43,55 Our results were also in accordance with the Interlymph findings in so far as in the pooled analysis no protective effect of alcohol was observed for European centers. 47 Similarly, the findings of the 2 other studies reporting an inverse association between alcohol intake and development of overall NHL were not based on European study populations, as one was a case-control study carried out in Japan 24 and the other one was a large American cohort study. 37 Our results reporting a protective effect of alcohol on development of NHL in countries like Ireland, Germany and Czech republic and the absence of such an effect in Mediterranean countries are consistent with findings from previous epidemiological studies revealing a protective effect of alcohol essentially in USA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, risk estimates for alcohol consumption were adjusted by age (10-year intervals), sex, educational level (in 3 categories), smoking status (in 3 categories) and study center. 47,48 Never-smokers were the reference category for each of the analyses performed concerning tobacco smoking, and never regular drinkers were the reference category for each of the analyses performed concerning alcohol drinking. Linear trends were calculated by including categorical exposure variables as continuous variables in the regression models, and significance was tested by the Wald test (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Lifetime Alcohol Consumption ðKgþ ¼mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…368,369,373,374,376,382,388,[394][395][396][397][398][399] In a recent pooled analysis of 9 case-control studies, Morton et al 398 reported a significant inverse association with alcohol (pooled OR 5 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.89), which did not vary with frequency or duration of intake, or by type of alcoholic beverage (OR for beer only, compared to nondrinkers 5 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95; OR for wine only 5 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.99; OR for liquor only 5 0.90, 95% CI: 0.74-1.09). In a subgroup analysis of 4 of the studies with sufficient data, relative risk estimates were lower for current drinkers (pooled OR 5 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64-0.84) than for former drinkers (pooled OR 5 0.95, 95% CI: 0.80-1.14), compared to nondrinkers.…”
Section: Lifestyle and Personal Factors Tobacco And Alcohol Usementioning
confidence: 99%