2002
DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2002.10603511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alcohol-Free Alternative Activities for University Students: Modeling Associated Drinking Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available data suggest LNPS may be an effective strategy, although the designs of previous evaluations cannot rule out potential selection effects in which individuals who are opposed to or not attracted to drinking or heavy drinking are most likely to attend LNPS. Students who ever participated in LNPS activities were less likely to drink and party heavily compared to students who had never participated (Maney et al 2002b). According to a 2002 institutional survey (Penn State Student Affairs 2002), the percentage of students who ever participated in LNPS increased from 30% in Fall 1998, to 46% in Spring 2000, to 57% in Fall 2002.…”
Section: Latenight Penn State (Lnps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available data suggest LNPS may be an effective strategy, although the designs of previous evaluations cannot rule out potential selection effects in which individuals who are opposed to or not attracted to drinking or heavy drinking are most likely to attend LNPS. Students who ever participated in LNPS activities were less likely to drink and party heavily compared to students who had never participated (Maney et al 2002b). According to a 2002 institutional survey (Penn State Student Affairs 2002), the percentage of students who ever participated in LNPS increased from 30% in Fall 1998, to 46% in Spring 2000, to 57% in Fall 2002.…”
Section: Latenight Penn State (Lnps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the literature indicates the potential of alcohol-free options to afford opportunities for socialising in lower-risk settings, thereby creating a safe and enjoyable environment in which to live and learn (Maney et al , 2002), the outcomes of our qualitative study in relation to mocktail events were limited. The mocktail events were considered by students to be fun and engaging however had little or no impact on their alcohol consumption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of literature associated with alcohol use and related problems, with studies reporting on alcohol misuse and its consequences at the university campus level, the state level and at the national level (Lewis and Gouker, 2007). Issues of drinking behaviour and excessive consumption of alcohol during adolescence or young adulthood have been discussed at length in the literature (Maney et al , 2002; Martin et al , 2009; Mallett et al , 2011). In brief, the literature suggests that excessive alcohol consumption is more acute among university/college students (Gill, 2002; Wilson et al , 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%