A Twenty-First Century Guide to Aldersonian Marketing Thought
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-28181-9_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alderson’s Transvection and Porter’s Value System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with marketing channels literature, roles and divergent purposes in relation to series of sorts are accounted for (Rosenbloom, 1995). The transvection is also distinguishable from Porter's value chain model (Prier et al , 2006). The basic assumption of the transvection model is that utility measured from an end‐user perspective, is generated through a piecemeal process involving sequential dependencies; between actors managing serially organised goods‐transforming activities.…”
Section: Frame Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with marketing channels literature, roles and divergent purposes in relation to series of sorts are accounted for (Rosenbloom, 1995). The transvection is also distinguishable from Porter's value chain model (Prier et al , 2006). The basic assumption of the transvection model is that utility measured from an end‐user perspective, is generated through a piecemeal process involving sequential dependencies; between actors managing serially organised goods‐transforming activities.…”
Section: Frame Of Referencementioning
confidence: 99%