Many patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) achieve remission following standard front-line therapy. Regardless of age, stage and risk factors, DLBCL patients in remission after R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) and without relapse 24 months post treatment will have comparable or near comparable residual life expectancy as the age-and gender-matched general population. 1,2 The vast majority of HL patients are cured with modern positron emission tomography or computed tomography imaging positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided treatments. BEACOPPescalated (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisolone) is an effective front-line treatment for high-risk disease resulting in a five-year overall survival of 90% or higher but also a salvage option for patients with incomplete response after ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). 3,4 Similar to DLBCL observations, HL patients without events in the first two years after treatment have survival very close to that in the background population. 5,6 Despite the chronic nature of FL, survival outlooks are also excellent in this disease, especially for the 80% who do not experience progression of disease within the first 24 months after frontline therapy. 7 The high cure rates, especially for B-cell lymphomas but also for a significant minority of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), warrant more pro-active considerations on what can be done to improve survivorship from initial diagnosis. 8,9 Historically in the study of late toxicities the focus has been on HL because of the younger demographic and high cure rates. For example, mammography for early detection of breast cancer secondary to breast irradiation is advocated for female HL survivors. 10 While focus on life-threatening late