Abstract:Summary. In the article, I introduce the notions of the compactification of topological spaces and the Alexandroff one point compactification. Some properties of the locally compact spaces and one point compactification are proved. Let X be a topological space and let P be a family of subsets of X. We say that P is compact if and only if: (Def. 1) For every subset U of X such that U ∈ P holds U is compact.Let X be a topological space and let U be a subset of X. We say that U is relatively-compact if and only i… Show more
“…( 23) ( κ α=0 R 1 (α)) κ∈N is convergent in the second coordinate if and only if the partial sums in the second coordinate of R 1 is convergent in the second coordinate. The theorem is a consequence of ( 19), (12), and (11). Let us consider a natural number k. Now we state the propositions:…”
Section: Double Series and Their Convergencementioning
confidence: 83%
“…) κ∈N is convergent in the first coordinate if and only if the partial sums in the first coordinate of R 1 is convergent in the first coordinate. The theorem is a consequence of ( 19), (12), and ( 11). ( 23) ( κ α=0 R 1 (α)) κ∈N is convergent in the second coordinate if and only if the partial sums in the second coordinate of R 1 is convergent in the second coordinate.…”
Section: Double Series and Their Convergencementioning
confidence: 89%
“…(iv) (the partial sums in the second coordinate of R 1 T ) T = the partial sums in the first coordinate of R 1 . The theorem is a consequence of (9). Let R 1 be a function from N × N into R. The functor ( κ α=0 R 1 (α)) κ∈N yielding a function from N × N into R is defined by the term (Def.…”
Section: Double Series and Their Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notation and terminology used in this paper have been introduced in the following articles: [7], [1], [2], [18], [6], [9], [16], [11], [12], [23], [25], [30], [17], [3], [4], [13], [21], [20], [28], [29], [14], [22], [24], [27], and [15].…”
Summary
In this paper the author constructs several properties for double series and its convergence. The notions of convergence of double sequence have already been introduced in our previous paper [18]. In section 1 we introduce double series and their convergence. Then we show the relationship between Pringsheim-type convergence and iterated convergence. In section 2 we study double series having non-negative terms. As a result, we have equality of three type sums of non-negative double sequence. In section 3 we show that if a non-negative sequence is summable, then the sequence of rearrangement of terms is summable and it has the same sums. In the last section two basic relations between double sequences and matrices are introduced.
“…( 23) ( κ α=0 R 1 (α)) κ∈N is convergent in the second coordinate if and only if the partial sums in the second coordinate of R 1 is convergent in the second coordinate. The theorem is a consequence of ( 19), (12), and (11). Let us consider a natural number k. Now we state the propositions:…”
Section: Double Series and Their Convergencementioning
confidence: 83%
“…) κ∈N is convergent in the first coordinate if and only if the partial sums in the first coordinate of R 1 is convergent in the first coordinate. The theorem is a consequence of ( 19), (12), and ( 11). ( 23) ( κ α=0 R 1 (α)) κ∈N is convergent in the second coordinate if and only if the partial sums in the second coordinate of R 1 is convergent in the second coordinate.…”
Section: Double Series and Their Convergencementioning
confidence: 89%
“…(iv) (the partial sums in the second coordinate of R 1 T ) T = the partial sums in the first coordinate of R 1 . The theorem is a consequence of (9). Let R 1 be a function from N × N into R. The functor ( κ α=0 R 1 (α)) κ∈N yielding a function from N × N into R is defined by the term (Def.…”
Section: Double Series and Their Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notation and terminology used in this paper have been introduced in the following articles: [7], [1], [2], [18], [6], [9], [16], [11], [12], [23], [25], [30], [17], [3], [4], [13], [21], [20], [28], [29], [14], [22], [24], [27], and [15].…”
Summary
In this paper the author constructs several properties for double series and its convergence. The notions of convergence of double sequence have already been introduced in our previous paper [18]. In section 1 we introduce double series and their convergence. Then we show the relationship between Pringsheim-type convergence and iterated convergence. In section 2 we study double series having non-negative terms. As a result, we have equality of three type sums of non-negative double sequence. In section 3 we show that if a non-negative sequence is summable, then the sequence of rearrangement of terms is summable and it has the same sums. In the last section two basic relations between double sequences and matrices are introduced.
“…1.1 that uses the notion of a set, such as given e.g. in [3]: the collections in the clauses (i) and (ii) of Def. 1.1 are then 'sets' in the sense of ZF.…”
Abstract-Recently Feferman (Rev. Symb. Logic 6: 6-15, 2013) has outlined a program for the development of a foundation for naive category theory. While Ernst (ibid. 8: 306-327, 2015) has shown that the resulting axiomatic system is still inconsistent, the purpose of this note is to show that nevertheless some foundation has to be developed before naive category theory can replace axiomatic set theory as a foundational theory for mathematics. It is argued that in naive category theory currently a 'cookbook recipe' is used for constructing categories, and it is explicitly shown with a formalized argument that this "foundationless" naive category theory therefore contains a paradox similar to the Russell paradox of naive set theory.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.