2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algae-facilitated chemical phosphorus removal during high-density Chlorella emersonii cultivation in a membrane bioreactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
40
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The biomass productivity was higher compared with other studies operated at an HRT of 1 d; Honda et al. reported biomass productivity of 48 mg/L·d in a submerged membrane PBR using ASE [22], and Xu et al reported production of 32.5 mg/L·d using an algae-based membrane bioreactor (A-MBR) [13].…”
Section: Algal Growth and Nutrient Removal Under Continuous Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biomass productivity was higher compared with other studies operated at an HRT of 1 d; Honda et al. reported biomass productivity of 48 mg/L·d in a submerged membrane PBR using ASE [22], and Xu et al reported production of 32.5 mg/L·d using an algae-based membrane bioreactor (A-MBR) [13].…”
Section: Algal Growth and Nutrient Removal Under Continuous Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, existing technologies, such as sedimentation, filtration and centrifugation, are difficult to apply for microalgae harvesting in real scale. Membrane filtration has become a promising technology for microalgae harvesting due to various reasons such as low chance of chemical contamination and less biomass washout [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. To date, very limited studies have been conducted to investigate the applicability of M-PBR under continuous cultivation conditions of microalgae using sewage effluent as nutrient source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5), the average removal efficiency for the A-MBRs was 34%. As NO À 3 -N removal by algae relies on N uptake via cell assimilation and thereafter biomass wasting (Xu et al, 2014), it is not surprising that the N removal in such A-MBRs was low due to long SRT (25 d) operation. For comparison, the high-density algae cultivation resulted in good P removal, with an average removal efficiency of 78% at the influent phosphorus concentrations ranging from 4 to 9 mg/L (Fig.…”
Section: Nutrient Removal By Algae In A-mbrsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each A-MBR was operated as a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and it was fed with the same synthetic wastewater containing the following chemical components (in mM): NaNO 3 (0.16-0.07), NaCl (0.43), NaHCO 3 (1), MgSO 4 (0.3), CaCl 2 Á2H 2 O (0.17), K 2 HPO 4 (0.04-0.09), EDTA disodium salt dehydrate (0.01), and trace metals including Fe, Mn, Mo, Cu, Zn and Ni (Xu et al, 2014). K 2 HPO 4 and NaNO 3 were used as phosphorus and nitrogen sources, respectively, with the concentrations of P and N varying in the feed to study the nutrient removal efficiency at different nutrient concentrations.…”
Section: Algal Seeding Mbr Operation and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and was assessed in laboratory scale pilots. Average Total P-removal rates between 66 and 97% were reported under varying reactor configurations (RuizMartinez et al, 2012;Xu et al, 2014;Praveen and Loh, 2016). The potential of the technology at lab scale appears promising, although algal MBR has not been successfully operated at pilotscales under temperate or cooler conditions.…”
Section: Application Of Algal P Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%