1985
DOI: 10.2307/1940395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algal Periphyton Growth on Nutrient‐Diffusing Substrates: An in situ Bioassay

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Abstract. Differences in nutrient limitation for dominant species within an algal periphyton com? munity were determined using additions of N and P supplied by nutrient-diffus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
208
4
9

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
208
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Two species with different optimal nutrient ratios are able to coexist only if each species is a better competitor for the nutrient most limiting to the other species. It is unclear whether benthic algae compete exploitatively for nutrients, although evidence is rapidly accumulating that periphyton in lakes (e.g., Fairchild et al 1985) and streams can be nutrient limited (Bothwell 1989;Pringle 1990;Harvey et al 1998). Benthic algae in flowing waters may have less ability to affect nutrient avail-ability than phytoplankton in lakes because lotic algae are generally exposed to a continuous supply of nutrients (but see Mulholland et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two species with different optimal nutrient ratios are able to coexist only if each species is a better competitor for the nutrient most limiting to the other species. It is unclear whether benthic algae compete exploitatively for nutrients, although evidence is rapidly accumulating that periphyton in lakes (e.g., Fairchild et al 1985) and streams can be nutrient limited (Bothwell 1989;Pringle 1990;Harvey et al 1998). Benthic algae in flowing waters may have less ability to affect nutrient avail-ability than phytoplankton in lakes because lotic algae are generally exposed to a continuous supply of nutrients (but see Mulholland et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other, less expensive means for conducting nutrient enrichment treatments in the field have included less extensive nutrient pulse treatments (e.g., Lapointe 1987;Miller and Hay 1996) and various types of nutrient-leaching substrates such as porous clay flower pots containing commercial fertilizer (Hatcher and Larkum 1983), agar-based nutrient suspensions (Fairchild et al 1985;Tate 1990), or coated timerelease commercial fertilizer (M. M. Littler, D. S. Littler, and J. S. Feingold, pers. comm.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guild includes comparatively fast moving species that are superior competitors for nutrients in nutrient-rich environments (Fairchild et al, 1985; M a n u s c r i p t Van der Grinten et al, 2004) and can physically avoid stress within the benthic mat by moving to resource-rich microhabitats (Johnson et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%