1992
DOI: 10.21829/abm19.1992.646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algas marinas bentónicas de Isla Mujeres, Quintana Roo, México

Abstract: -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
14
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Neogoniolithon is the most important component of Mexican Caribbean coral reefs (Huerta-Múzquiz et al 1987, Mendoza-González & Mateo-Cid 1992, Ortega et al 2001, Mateo-Cid & Pedroche 2004 and is also very common on most of the rocky shores. However, despite Neogoniolithon's abundance, representatives of this genus from Mexico have not been critically studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neogoniolithon is the most important component of Mexican Caribbean coral reefs (Huerta-Múzquiz et al 1987, Mendoza-González & Mateo-Cid 1992, Ortega et al 2001, Mateo-Cid & Pedroche 2004 and is also very common on most of the rocky shores. However, despite Neogoniolithon's abundance, representatives of this genus from Mexico have not been critically studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape of stipe appendages agrees with those described by , and the dimensions of blade and stipe siphons are also consistent with description of and Collado-Vides et al (2009). The presence of this taxon could not be confirmed by the collection in Quintana Roo littoral, as mentioned by Huerta-Múzquiz et al (1987), Mendoza-González & Mateo-Cid (1992), Dreckmann et al (1996), Aguilar-Rosas et al (1998), Mendoza-González et al (2000), Aguilar-Rosas et al (2001) and Collado-Vides et al (2009), neither in the Campeche shoreline , possibly because this species is distributed at depths greater than those sampled in this study and only one specimen was obtained from the Yucatan coast. Udotea cyathiformis is recorded for the first time for the Yucatan littoral.…”
Section: Udotea Cyathiformis Decaisne 1842: 106mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…cited 21 taxa of Udotea for the Tropical Western Atlantic. Recently, Wynne (2017) recorded 23 infrageneric taxa (17 species, five forms and one variety) for the tropical and subtropical Western Atlantic, of them 16 have been documented for the littoral of the Yucatan peninsula: Sixteen taxa of Udotea have been reported for Quintana Roo coast (Huerta-Múzquiz 1958, Huerta-Múzquiz & Garza-Barrientos 1966, Taylor 1972, Garza-Barrientos 1975, Huerta-Múzquiz & Garza-Barrientos 1980, Huerta-Múzquiz et al 1987, Aguilar-Rosas et al 1989, Aguilar-Rosas 1990, Mendoza-González & Mateo-Cid 1992, Dreckmann et al 1996, Aguilar-Rosas et al 1998, Mendoza-González et al 2000, Aguilar-Rosas et al 2001 NA isolation and nucleotide sequencing Partial sequence of the rbcL gene sequences was used to verify the identity of the genus Udotea from the collected samples. A total of ten field collected samples of Udotea algae (six corticated and four uncorticated specimens) were preserved in silica gel desiccant (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) before DNA extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la temporada climática de secas, se encontró un mayor número de especies de algas epífitas en Santa Rosa que las reportadas previamente para el Caribe mexicano por QuanYoung et al (2006), pero inferior a las registradas por MateoCid & Mendoza-González (1991) y Mendoza-González & Mateo-Cid (1992). En el caso de las especies localizadas en Penacho del Indio, Veracruz, se ubicó un número mayor que los determinados por Mateo-Cid et al (1996) y Robinson et al (2012), lo que permite fortalecer los registros de riqueza específica para la zona de estudio.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Además se encontraron especímenes de los géneros Gayliella T.O.Cho, L.J.McIvor & S.M.Boo, Herposiphonia Nägeli, Lophosiphonia Falkenberg y Polysiphonia Greville sobre la misma hoja, con 3 diferentes estadios reproductivos: gametangios, carposporangios y tetrasporangios, es decir, las 3 generaciones que constituyen el ciclo de vida de estas algas rojas. El hecho que la fase esporofitica fuera la más abundante representa una ventaja, ya que requieren de un menor gasto energético para la formación de esporas, hay una diseminación en forma rápida, una dispersión eficiente, una alta probabilidad de fijación y (Huerta-Múzquiz et al 1987, MateoCid & Mendoza-González 1991, Mendoza-González & Mateo-Cid 1992, Aguilar-Rosas et al 1998, Mateo-Cid & Mendoza-González 2007. Es por ello que son consideradas oportunistas y euritípicas, además de encontrarse entre los primeros estadios sucesionales en el forofito (Littler & Littler 1980).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified