1966
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.16.371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebra of Currents andKe3Decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, let us mention another low-energy theorem, namely the Callan -Treiman -Mathur -Okubo -Pandit relation for E&3 decays, which reads (Callan and Treiman, 1966;Mathur, Okubo, and Pandit, 1966) f+(mlt2) + f (mrt') = f~/f (2 45) where the semileptonic decay constants f and fz are again given by Eq. (2.9) and the scalar form factors are defined by (~'t U, +~(0)~K+)…”
Section: Low-energy Theorem For Meson-nucleon Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, let us mention another low-energy theorem, namely the Callan -Treiman -Mathur -Okubo -Pandit relation for E&3 decays, which reads (Callan and Treiman, 1966;Mathur, Okubo, and Pandit, 1966) f+(mlt2) + f (mrt') = f~/f (2 45) where the semileptonic decay constants f and fz are again given by Eq. (2.9) and the scalar form factors are defined by (~'t U, +~(0)~K+)…”
Section: Low-energy Theorem For Meson-nucleon Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus However, since SU, is not exact we must retain both form factors. As before, we may obtain a soft-pion theorem, known as the C T M O P relation (Callan and Treiman 1966, Mathur et al 1966) f$(mH) +f YmH) = fKiV'2fT (3.152) wheref: are the form factors f, for zero-mass pions (v2 = 0). Thus the soft-pion theorem relates the K,, decay to the K,, decay.…”
Section: N)-3(4kono)-1~~(f+(q2)(k+n)a+f-(q2)qh}mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…But the κ name stuck. The need for a near-threshold κ state besides the K * observed above 1.3 GeV was also required from attempts to saturate the Adler-Weisberger Axial-charge sum rule for πK scattering, although the mass predictions were very crude, ranging from 0.85-1.2 MeV [39] or 500-740 MeV [40]. This predicted state was much wider than 30 MeV, even reaching a 450 MeV width 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%