2019
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2019006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic flux correction schemes preserving the eigenvalue range of symmetric tensor fields

Abstract: This work extends the algebraic flux correction (AFC) paradigm to finite element discretizations of conservation laws for symmetric tensor fields. The proposed algorithms are designed to enforce discrete maximum principles and preserve the eigenvalue range of evolving tensors. To that end, a continuous Galerkin approximation is modified by adding a linear artificial diffusion operator and a nonlinear antidiffusive correction. The latter is decomposed into edge-based fluxes and constrained to prevent violations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If u h is linear onΩ i and the parameter γ i is defined by (1.16), then α i = 1 and, therefore, g * i = g i = ∇u m h . In general, our formula (1.11) will produce α m = 1 if the magnitude of ∇u m h does not exceed that of the smallest nodal gradient by more than a factor of p. Lipschitz continuity of α m f m i can be shown following Lohmann's [11] proofs for edge-based tensor limiters.…”
Section: Nonlinear High-order Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…If u h is linear onΩ i and the parameter γ i is defined by (1.16), then α i = 1 and, therefore, g * i = g i = ∇u m h . In general, our formula (1.11) will produce α m = 1 if the magnitude of ∇u m h does not exceed that of the smallest nodal gradient by more than a factor of p. Lipschitz continuity of α m f m i can be shown following Lohmann's [11] proofs for edge-based tensor limiters.…”
Section: Nonlinear High-order Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Unfortunately, these ideas cannot be easily extended to implicit time integration and we are not aware of any implicit method that theoretically satisfies such properties. Kuzmin and co-workers [36,41,46,47] have proposed various schemes based on flux corrected transport (FCT) [44] that are experimentally robust, but lack of a theoretical analysis. Besides, this strategy also yields very stiff nonlinear problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these ideas cannot be easily extended to implicit time integration and we are not aware of any implicit method that theoretically satisfies such properties. Kuzmin and co-workers [61,69,74,75] have proposed various schemes based on FCT [72] that are experimentally robust, but lack of a theoretical analysis. Besides, this strategy also yields very stiff nonlinear problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%