1982
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(82)90286-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebraic formulation of duality transformations for abelian lattice models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known [26] that the duality symmetry of this model maps the free boundary condition to any of the three fixed boundary conditions, and indeed this is a specific case of the general duality [27] between free and 'configurational' boundary conditions of lattice spin models. Similarly, the new boundary condition discovered in [26] gets mapped to any of the three mixed boundary conditions.…”
Section: T-dualitymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known [26] that the duality symmetry of this model maps the free boundary condition to any of the three fixed boundary conditions, and indeed this is a specific case of the general duality [27] between free and 'configurational' boundary conditions of lattice spin models. Similarly, the new boundary condition discovered in [26] gets mapped to any of the three mixed boundary conditions.…”
Section: T-dualitymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For everỹ r = 1, 2, ... , 2ℓ+2, the integer E(r) lies in the label set of the A 4ℓ+1 graph; indeed, the exponents correspond precisely to the black nodes of A 4ℓ+1 , with the middle node appearing twice. We can therefore define for every s = 1, 2, ... , 4ℓ+1 a matrix V s through 27) where S (A) and S (D) are the unitary diagonalizing matrices for the graphs A 4ℓ+1 and D 2ℓ+2 . Thus S (A) is nothing but the modular S-matrix of the sl(2) 4ℓ WZW model.…”
Section: Virasoro Minimal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This "geometrical" duality of cellular complexes pictorially exchanges k-cells with (D − k)-cells, and the physical state is now a (D − k − 2)-cochain. This is the general strategy, explained in detail, for example, in the review part of [2], or in [3].…”
Section: Introduction Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second reason for rank loss in connection matrices is that if H has a proper automorphism (a permutation of the nodes that preserves both the nodeweights and edgeweights), then in formula (22), any two terms defined by a mapping φ : [k] → V (H) and φσ (σ ∈ Aut(H)) are equal, so the sum of all such terms is still rank 1. So the rank of M (hom(·, H), k) is at most the number of orbits of the automorphism group of H on ordered k-tuples of its nodes.…”
Section: The Exact Rank Of Connection Matrices For Homomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using arguments related to duality transformations of models in statistical physics (see e.g. [22] and references therein) one can show [28] that this weighted graph H represents sflo in the sense that sflo(·) = hom(·, H). The condition on S that it is closed under inversion can be dropped if we use homomorphisms of directed graphs (Section 3.5).…”
Section: Edge Colorings and Homomorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%