2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2007.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebras of quotients of path algebras

Abstract: Leavitt path algebras are shown to be algebras of right quotients of their corresponding path algebras. Using this fact we obtain maximal algebras of right quotients from those (Leavitt) path algebras whose associated graph satisfies that every vertex connects to a line point (equivalently, the Leavitt path algebra has essential socle). We also introduce and characterize the algebraic counterpart of Toeplitz algebras.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, at least α j = α * j α j α j appears in the expression for α * j xuα j because if we had α j = α * j α i α j for some i ≠ j, then deg(α i ) = deg(α j ) which implies α * j α i = 0 and therefore α i = 0, a contradiction. This shows that α * j xuα j has at least a nonzero monomial, and because distinct elements of KE are linearly independent (see [22,Lemma 1.1]), then α * j xuα j ≠ 0. Now, this element has at most r summands because α * j α j+1 α j = 0 and it satisfies the induction hypothesis, so that…”
Section: The Prime Spectrum Correspondencementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, at least α j = α * j α j α j appears in the expression for α * j xuα j because if we had α j = α * j α i α j for some i ≠ j, then deg(α i ) = deg(α j ) which implies α * j α i = 0 and therefore α i = 0, a contradiction. This shows that α * j xuα j has at least a nonzero monomial, and because distinct elements of KE are linearly independent (see [22,Lemma 1.1]), then α * j xuα j ≠ 0. Now, this element has at most r summands because α * j α j+1 α j = 0 and it satisfies the induction hypothesis, so that…”
Section: The Prime Spectrum Correspondencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…By using the results above, it is straightforward to check that L(E) is prime but not left (nor right) primitive, whereas L(F ) is left (and right) primitive but not simple. In fact L(E) K[x, x −1 ] (see [1,Examples 1.4]), and L(F ) T where T denotes the algebraic Toeplitz algebra (see [22,Theorem 5.3]).…”
Section: Corollary 310 Let E Be a Graph L(e) Is Prime If And Only If ...mentioning
confidence: 99%