2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498814500777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algebras simple with respect to a Sweedler's algebra action

Abstract: Algebras simple with respect to an action of Sweedler's algebra $H_4$ deliver the easiest example of $H$-module algebras that are $H$-simple but not necessarily semisimple. We describe finite dimensional $H_4$-simple algebras and prove the analog of Amitsur's conjecture for codimensions of their polynomial $H_4$-identities. In particular, we show that the Hopf PI-exponent of an $H_4$-simple algebra $A$ over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$ equals $\dim A$. The groups of automorphisms preserv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in those results the H-invariance of the Jacobson radical was required. Until now the algebras simple with respect to an action of H 4 (−1) were the only example where the analog of Amitsur's conjecture was proved for an H-simple non-semisimple algebra [14]. In this article we prove the analog of Amitsur's conjecture for all finite dimensional H m 2 (ζ)-simple algebras not necessarily semisimple (Section 4) assuming that the base field is algebraically closed and of characteristic 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in those results the H-invariance of the Jacobson radical was required. Until now the algebras simple with respect to an action of H 4 (−1) were the only example where the analog of Amitsur's conjecture was proved for an H-simple non-semisimple algebra [14]. In this article we prove the analog of Amitsur's conjecture for all finite dimensional H m 2 (ζ)-simple algebras not necessarily semisimple (Section 4) assuming that the base field is algebraically closed and of characteristic 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The case m = 2 is worked out in detail in [14]. Below we list several examples that are consequences of Theorems 1 and 2.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exact module categories over the category Rep(H m 2 (ζ)) were studied in [6,Theorem 4.10]. Finite dimensional associative H m 2 (ζ)simple H m 2 (ζ)-module algebras were classified in [13,14]. H m 2 (ζ)-actions on path algebras of quivers were studied in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have mentioned above, the proofs in all previous papers [1,2,17,21,23,24,38] worked only in the case when the Jacobson radical J(A) was an H-submodule or A was H-simple itself. In the current article we do not assume that the Jacobson radical of A is H-invariant, replacing the Wedderburn -Mal'cev theorem by its weak analog (Lemma 2.6) which still makes it possible to transfer the computations to H-simple algebras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%