1983
DOI: 10.1145/356022.356029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm 594: Software for Relative Error Analysis

Abstract: DESCRIPTIONThis package performs an automatic round-off error analysis of numerical algorithms, which is useful in determining the numerical properties (stability) of such algorithms. The approach taken with this software differs from that of Miller [4,5] by dealing with relative as opposed to absolute error analysis. This is the natural approach taken for dealing with floating-point arithmetic. In addition, this software gives an accurate analysis of an algorithm for some fixed data, rather than searches for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] highlights those portions of a priori roundoff error analysis which can possibly be automated. More specific attempts are those which aim at developing software for error analysis in a numerical computational setting [10], [11], [12] and [13]. As regards algebraic computing, the concept of error analysis based on computer algebra system (CAS) for differential error-propagation model is introduced in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] highlights those portions of a priori roundoff error analysis which can possibly be automated. More specific attempts are those which aim at developing software for error analysis in a numerical computational setting [10], [11], [12] and [13]. As regards algebraic computing, the concept of error analysis based on computer algebra system (CAS) for differential error-propagation model is introduced in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We by Miller [37], [38] and by recent work of Rowan [47]. Miller In [38] Miller and Spooner extend the work in [37] [37], [38], and [39] A different approach to algorithm analysis is taken in [35], [36]. Here errors are measured in a relative rather than an absolute sense, and the stability is analyzed at fixed data instead of attempting to maximize instability over all data; however, the analysis is still linearized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%