2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1823-4_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm for Gunshot Detection Using Mel-Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC)

Abstract: Protection of forests and wildlife needs efficient, reliable, and real-time detection of events such as gunshots, wood cutting, distress call of animals, etc. In this paper, we propose a gunshot detection technique through acoustic signal pattern recognition utilizing Mel-Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC). In this work, MFCC is used to extract the features of gunshots from prerecorded analog sound files. Training of the system for gunshot detection has been done using a three layer Artificial Neural Netwo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Suman [28] also tested MFCC and three layer Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) classifier achieving 95 % for clean and 85 % for noisy recordings. As we can see, our system is comparable with other systems described in the relevant papers using inexpensive and easy to deploy components (common outdoor microphone or existing noise monitoring stations could be used).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Suman [28] also tested MFCC and three layer Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) classifier achieving 95 % for clean and 85 % for noisy recordings. As we can see, our system is comparable with other systems described in the relevant papers using inexpensive and easy to deploy components (common outdoor microphone or existing noise monitoring stations could be used).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection, classification and localization (using Acoustic Vector Sensor) could be done in separate modules as it is described in [16,17]. There have been similar gunshot detection systems already presented in the papers based on MFCC, LPC (Linear Prediction Coefficients) & HMM [7], GMM with MPEG-7 and MFCC feature vector reduced using floating search vector feature selection method [8] and [30], pitch range (PR) of non-speech sounds and the Autocorrelation Function using Support Vector Machines (SVM) with Gaussian kernel and Radial Basis Function Neural Network classifiers [29] and recently MFCC and three layer Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) classifier [28]. Their detection results are discussed and compared in the conclusion section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motivation of this work stems from the fact that datasets containing sounds closely related to gunshot sounds are not readily available for research purposes. Although a great amount of work has been presented in the detection of gunshot sounds [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], comparative analyses of similar audio events are not as detailed, though in the literature, researchers carried out comparative analyses of similar sounding events to gunshot audio events with abrupt changes in energy, such as door slams, claps, and firecrackers [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [16] provided the comparison of impulsive sounds which includes the explosion of a balloon, clap and the sound of plosive consonants such a [p], [t], and [k]. The authors of [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] all discuss the detection of gunshot sounds in comparison to other sounds; however, they did not provide a database of the non-gunshot sounds readily available for further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silah sesi sınıflandırmak için MFCC ile LPC öznitelikleri, çaprazkorelasyon ve SVM sınıflandırıcı kullanılan çalışmada, farklı atış mesafelerinden G3 ve MP5 silahlar ile elde edilen 332 atış ve 102 yabancı ses kaydı kullanılmış, LPC ve çaprazkorelasyon ile Destek Vektör Makineleri (SVM -Support Vektor Machine) sınıflandırıcıda %99.7'lik bir doğru sınıflandırmaya ulaşılmıştır [2]. Suman vd., 150 silah sesi ile MFCC ve üç katmanlı Yapay Sinir Ağları (YSA) sınıflandırıcı ile gürültüsüz ortamda %95 ve gürültülü ortamda %85 başarı elde etmiştir [18].…”
Section: Gi̇ri̇ş (Introduction)unclassified