2012
DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1203.03050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm for Predicting Functionally Equivalent Proteins from BLAST and HMMER Searches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common assumption made in such sequence comparisons is that significant shifts in protein function will correspond to large differences in sequence, but at the molecular level even changes in single residues can produce drastic changes in function ( Anderson et al 2016 ). Our ability to identify orthologous genes far outpaces our ability to predict protein function based on sequence, resulting in a false positive rate of over 50% in studies that attempt to identify orthologous genes with equivalent protein functions ( Ponting 2001 ; Watson et al 2005 ; Yu et al 2012 ). Further, highly similar sequences do not necessarily indicate conservation of protein function, as is the case in the CCC, the hedgehog signaling pathway, or the glucocorticoid receptor family ( Ortlund et al 2007 ; Dickinson, Weis, et al 2011 ; Miller, Pokutta, et al 2013 ) (see supplementary table S1 , e.g., Supplementary Material online).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common assumption made in such sequence comparisons is that significant shifts in protein function will correspond to large differences in sequence, but at the molecular level even changes in single residues can produce drastic changes in function ( Anderson et al 2016 ). Our ability to identify orthologous genes far outpaces our ability to predict protein function based on sequence, resulting in a false positive rate of over 50% in studies that attempt to identify orthologous genes with equivalent protein functions ( Ponting 2001 ; Watson et al 2005 ; Yu et al 2012 ). Further, highly similar sequences do not necessarily indicate conservation of protein function, as is the case in the CCC, the hedgehog signaling pathway, or the glucocorticoid receptor family ( Ortlund et al 2007 ; Dickinson, Weis, et al 2011 ; Miller, Pokutta, et al 2013 ) (see supplementary table S1 , e.g., Supplementary Material online).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BLAST software was utilized to compare the Unigene sequence with NR, Swiss-Prot, GO, COG, KOG, and KEGG databases; HMMER software was employed to compare the Unigene sequence with Pfam database after predicting the amino acid sequence of Unigene; and the annotation information of Unigene was obtained [ 59 ]. By selecting BLAST parameter E-value less than 1 × 10 −5 and HMMER parameter E-value less than 1 × 10 −10 , Unigene with annotation information was finally acquired.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pfam domains, signal peptide cleavage sites and transmembrane helices were also identified and integrated into the database. These were predicted using HMMER [ 64 ], signal [ 65 ] and tmHMM [ 66 ] respectively with default parameters. Finally, Gene Ontology (GO) and eggNOG information were obtained from the Swiss-Prot database [ 63 ], whereas associated KEGG pathways were identified by a BLASTP search with an E-value cutoff 10e-10.…”
Section: Construction and Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%