1973
DOI: 10.1086/152530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithm for Solving the Nonlinear Pulsar Equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of the magnetic field lines suggests that the dead zone extends all the way up to the light cylinder. Beyond the light cylinder the poloidal magnetic field becomes radial, as expected (Ingraham 1973; Michel 1974). Some magnetic field lines are closing up beyond the light cylinder but they do so within the equatorial current sheet due to the finite artificial resistivity in the numerical scheme – it is easy to see the transition between the dead zone and the current sheet within which the magnetic field lines are highly stretched in the radial direction.…”
Section: Mhd Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The structure of the magnetic field lines suggests that the dead zone extends all the way up to the light cylinder. Beyond the light cylinder the poloidal magnetic field becomes radial, as expected (Ingraham 1973; Michel 1974). Some magnetic field lines are closing up beyond the light cylinder but they do so within the equatorial current sheet due to the finite artificial resistivity in the numerical scheme – it is easy to see the transition between the dead zone and the current sheet within which the magnetic field lines are highly stretched in the radial direction.…”
Section: Mhd Modelsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(This property makes the problem somewhat similar to the classical eigenvalue problem in the theory of differential equations.) Ingraham (1973) even proposed an iterative algorithm for finding this function. In the same year Michel (1973) did actually find an exact solution to the pulsar equation in the case of a split‐monopole magnetic field that passed through the singular surface both continuously and smoothly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, in the axisymmetric split‐monopole solution for the aligned rotator (Michel 1973), the Poynting flux is proportional to sin 2 θ, where θ is the polar angle. Such a distribution is a natural feature of axisymmetric MHD flows because in the far zone the magnetic field is almost azimuthal and, thus, must vanish at the symmetry axis (Ingraham 1973; Michel 1974). The situation is less clear for the winds from oblique rotators; however, the results of Bogovalov (1999) suggest that the angular distribution of their Poynting flux may not be all that different after all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%