Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3366423.3380281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic Effects on the Diversity of Consumption on Spotify

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of recommendation devices in fostering diversity is assuredly at the heart of a fast-growing literature focused on a myriad of platform types, where music streaming is only one application case among many. Contrarily to popular assumptions about so-called "filter bubbles", the emerging empirical picture suggests that recommendation algorithms generally seem to increase diversity and serendipity [1,4,19,29,35,36], even though recent results on specific platforms such as Spotify or YouTube tend to suggest otherwise [3,37], while explicit personalization or "self-selection" also appear to induce algorithmic reinforcement and confinement, for instance regarding news consumption [14,51]. Most of this literature works at the aggregate level without distinguishing populations of users who may differently use or respond to algorithmic guidance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of recommendation devices in fostering diversity is assuredly at the heart of a fast-growing literature focused on a myriad of platform types, where music streaming is only one application case among many. Contrarily to popular assumptions about so-called "filter bubbles", the emerging empirical picture suggests that recommendation algorithms generally seem to increase diversity and serendipity [1,4,19,29,35,36], even though recent results on specific platforms such as Spotify or YouTube tend to suggest otherwise [3,37], while explicit personalization or "self-selection" also appear to induce algorithmic reinforcement and confinement, for instance regarding news consumption [14,51]. Most of this literature works at the aggregate level without distinguishing populations of users who may differently use or respond to algorithmic guidance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to education, Bolson, Rodrigues and Revello de Lima (2020) comment that these technologies allow not only to broaden the horizons of students within the classroom, instigating their curiosities, but also contribute positively to corporate environments and for the family environment; providing an abundance of information that is available in the most varied media and channels, favoring curiosity, arousing exploration and research, as well as the digital autonomy of these generations (Rolim, Mello & Costa, 2017;cf. Uline, 1996).…”
Section: Exponential and Disruptive Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compute the embedding vector of a query as a weighted average of the Word2Vec [23] vectors of the clicked results. Similarly, the vector representation of a track is computed based on its co-occurrence statistics across playlists and the vector representation of an artist is the weighted average of the tracks they have performed [4].…”
Section: Standalone Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%