2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic portfolio tilting to harvest higher moment gains

Abstract: Many financial portfolios are not mean-variance-skewness-kurtosis efficient. We recommend tilting these portfolios in a direction that increases their estimated mean and third central moment and decreases their variance and fourth central moment. The advantages of tilting come at the cost of deviation from the initial optimality criterion. In this paper, we show the usefulness of portfolio tilting applied to the equally-weighted, equal-risk-contribution and maximum diversification portfolios in a UCITS-complia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in this section, we generalize the idea of the RFPA algorithm for solving another important high-order portfolio called the MVSK-Tilting problem with general deterioration measures. This MVSK-Tilting portfolio aims at improving a given portfolio that is not sufficiently optimal from the MVSK perspective by tilting it toward a direction that simultaneously ameliorates all the objectives [45], [46].…”
Section: Extension: Solving Mvsk-tilting Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this section, we generalize the idea of the RFPA algorithm for solving another important high-order portfolio called the MVSK-Tilting problem with general deterioration measures. This MVSK-Tilting portfolio aims at improving a given portfolio that is not sufficiently optimal from the MVSK perspective by tilting it toward a direction that simultaneously ameliorates all the objectives [45], [46].…”
Section: Extension: Solving Mvsk-tilting Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is Kronecker product (e.g. Martellini and Ziemann (2010); Boudt, Cornilly, Van Holle, and Willems (2020)).…”
Section: Cardinality-constrained Portfolio Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%