2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00454-016-9855-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithmic Solvability of the Lifting-Extension Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a classical and well-studied topic in geometric topology (see, e.g., [56] for a survey) and a natural higher-dimensional generalization of graph planarity (the case k = 1, d = 2). Recently, a significant effort has been devoted to the systematic study of embeddability in higher dimensions from an algorithmic viewpoint [36,39,59]. In particular, it is now known that embeddability of a kdimensional complex into R d is algorithmically decid-able for d ≤ 3 [39] and algorithmically undecidable for…”
Section: Computing Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is a classical and well-studied topic in geometric topology (see, e.g., [56] for a survey) and a natural higher-dimensional generalization of graph planarity (the case k = 1, d = 2). Recently, a significant effort has been devoted to the systematic study of embeddability in higher dimensions from an algorithmic viewpoint [36,39,59]. In particular, it is now known that embeddability of a kdimensional complex into R d is algorithmically decid-able for d ≤ 3 [39] and algorithmically undecidable for…”
Section: Computing Embeddingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper forms part of a systematic effort [5,2,54,50,7,34,9,8,6,38,60,15,59,48,49] to understand the computational complexity of questions in homotopy theory such as computing π d (X) or [X, Y ] for given spaces X and Y ; for these algorithmic versions of the problems, the input spaces are assumed to be represented combinatorially as (finite) simplicial complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations