2012
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for a strain‐based plasticity criterion for bone

Abstract: A range of stress-based plasticity criteria have been employed in the finite element analysis of the post-elastic behaviour of bone. There is some recognition now that strain-based criteria are more suitable for this material because they better represent its behaviour. Moreover, because bone yields at relatively isotropic strains, a strain-based criterion requires fewer material parameters unlike those required for a stress-based criterion. Based on a minimum and maximum principal strain criterion, a robust s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study shows that the macroscopic yield surface of bone in normal strain space is fairly uniform across a wide range of samples; this confirms findings of previous research (Bayraktar et al, 2004;Lambers et al, 2014;Pankaj and Donaldson, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study shows that the macroscopic yield surface of bone in normal strain space is fairly uniform across a wide range of samples; this confirms findings of previous research (Bayraktar et al, 2004;Lambers et al, 2014;Pankaj and Donaldson, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In recent years a consensus appears to be emerging that strainbased criteria are easier to apply as trabecular bone behaviour in this space is "more isotropic" and density independent than in stress space (Bayraktar et al, 2004;Chang et al, 1999;Pankaj and Donaldson, 2013). There is also now some evidence to suggest that failure of bone is strain-controlled rather than stress-controlled (Nalla et al, 2003) (Bayraktar et al, 2004;Sanyal et al, 2015;Wolfram et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The bones were obtained from Meat Science Lab at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The principal principal strain, 36 (D) cast iron, and (E) Mohr-Coulomb trabecular direction was estimated by performing a low-resolution micro-CT imaging. Subsequently, samples were cut out of femoral heads in the principal direction to obtain cylinder shapes with~8-mm height and~4-mm diameter, using the aspect ratio of 2:1 recommended for uniaxial compression tests.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different yield surfaces that are used for modeling plasticity of trabecular bone tissue: (A) von‐Mises, (B) Drucker‐Prager, (C) principal strain, (D) cast iron, and (E) Mohr‐Coulomb…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure is typically modeled in micro-FE by changing the material properties of the bone elements according to a failure/yield criterion. This change in material properties has been based on plasticity (Donaldson et al 2008;Verhulp et al 2008a;Pankaj and Donaldson 2013) and nonlinear elasticity (Niebur et al 2000). However, the intrinsic material properties of bone depend on the complex organization of its basic constituents, namely a collagenous matrix with embedded platelike mineral crystals (Jager and Fratzl 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%