Proceedings. 2004 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, 2004. CSB 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/csb.2004.1332421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for association study design using a generalized model of haplotype conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike Becker et al (2006), we employ a hidden Markov model (HMM) to represent frequencies of all possible haplotypes over the set of typed loci. Similar HMMs have been successfully used in recent works (Kimmel and Shamir, 2005;Rastas et al, 2007;Scheet and Stephens, 2006;Schwartz, 2004) for genotype phasing and disease association. Two limitations of previous uses of HMMs in this context have been the relatively slow training based on genotype data and the inability to exploit available pedigree information.…”
Section: Kennedy Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike Becker et al (2006), we employ a hidden Markov model (HMM) to represent frequencies of all possible haplotypes over the set of typed loci. Similar HMMs have been successfully used in recent works (Kimmel and Shamir, 2005;Rastas et al, 2007;Scheet and Stephens, 2006;Schwartz, 2004) for genotype phasing and disease association. Two limitations of previous uses of HMMs in this context have been the relatively slow training based on genotype data and the inability to exploit available pedigree information.…”
Section: Kennedy Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HMM used to represent haplotype frequencies has a similar structure to HMMs recently used in Kimmel and Shamir (2005), Rastas et al (2007), Scheet and Stephens (2006), and Schwartz (2004). This structure ( Fig.…”
Section: Hidden Markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formally, for every SNP locus i ∈ {1, … , n }, we let be a random variable representing the allele observed at this locus on the maternal (paternal) chromosome of the individual under study, and be a random variable denoting the founder haplotype from which H i (respectively ) originates. As in previous works [ 15 , 17 , 28 - 30 ], we assume that F i form the states of a first order HMM with emissions H i , and estimate probabilities P ( f 1 ), P ( f i +1 | f i ), and P ( h i | f i )) using the classical Baum-Welch algorithm [ 31 ] based on haplotypes inferred from a panel representing the population of origin of the individual’s mother. Probabilities , and are estimated in the same way based on haplotypes inferred from a panel representing the population of origin of the individual’s father.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%