2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-70659-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for Learning Function Distinguishable Regular Languages

Abstract: Function distinguishable languages were introduced as a new methodology of defining characterizable subclasses of the regular languages which are learnable from text. Here, we give details on the implementation and the analysis of the corresponding learning algorithms. We also discuss problems which might occur in practical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As exhibited in [14] (based on the implementation of the 0-reversible language identification algorithm due to Angluin [3]), the algorithm sketched above can be implemented to run in nearly linear time, i.e., in time O(α −1 (2 n)2 n), where is the size of the input alphabet (this will become somewhat important in the following investigations), n is the total input size and α −1 is the inverse of the Ackermann function as defined by Tarjan [46]. In addition, "structural information" is sometimes provided to the learning algorithm (see [40] in the case of TDRL).…”
Section: Terminal Distinguishable Right-linear Languagesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As exhibited in [14] (based on the implementation of the 0-reversible language identification algorithm due to Angluin [3]), the algorithm sketched above can be implemented to run in nearly linear time, i.e., in time O(α −1 (2 n)2 n), where is the size of the input alphabet (this will become somewhat important in the following investigations), n is the total input size and α −1 is the inverse of the Ackermann function as defined by Tarjan [46]. In addition, "structural information" is sometimes provided to the learning algorithm (see [40] in the case of TDRL).…”
Section: Terminal Distinguishable Right-linear Languagesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Let us mention that the canonical objects required to define the convergence of the identification algorithm properly can be easily derived from the previous theorem and the canonical objects for TDRL-languages, as exhibited in [13,14]. Moreover, in this way, suitable characteristic samples for languages in TDRL − PC n GSTTfs can be obtained.…”
Section: Corollary 39mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof is based on Theorem 8 in Fernau [2000b] (also in Fernau [2003]). The only difference between our setting and the setting of Fernau [2003] is that our extended f-distinguishable function does not need to have a finite codomain on T * , while f-distinguishable functions do.…”
Section: A Proof: Identifiability In the Limit Of Prefix Mark-up Encmentioning
confidence: 99%