Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
DOI: 10.1109/sfcs.1994.365700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
3,784
1
90

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,590 publications
(3,880 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
3,784
1
90
Order By: Relevance
“…Most quantum algorithms are stochastic algorithms which can give the correct decision-making with probability 1-ǫ (ǫ > 0, close to 0) after several times of repeated computing [23], [25]. As for quantum reinforcement learning algorithms, optimal policies are acquired by the collapse of quantum system and we will analyze the optimality of these policies from two aspects as follows.…”
Section: B Optimality and Stochastic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most quantum algorithms are stochastic algorithms which can give the correct decision-making with probability 1-ǫ (ǫ > 0, close to 0) after several times of repeated computing [23], [25]. As for quantum reinforcement learning algorithms, optimal policies are acquired by the collapse of quantum system and we will analyze the optimality of these policies from two aspects as follows.…”
Section: B Optimality and Stochastic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some results have shown that quantum computation can more efficiently solve some difficult problems than the classical counterpart. Two important quantum algorithms, the Shor algorithm [23], [24] and the Grover algorithm [25], [26] have been proposed in 1994 and 1996, respectively. The Shor algorithm can give an exponential speedup for factoring large integers into prime numbers and it has been realized [27] for the factorization of integer 15 using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the computational hardness of the underlying problems in public-key cryptography have not been formally established, public-key cryptography is not immune to scenarios where an eavesdropper would possess some unexpectedly strong computational power or would know better cryptanalysis techniques than the best published ones. Moreover, most of the currently used public-key cryptographic schemes 2.3 Classical computationally secure symmetric-key cryptography and secret key agreement (for example RSA) could be cracked in polynomial time with a quantum computer: this results from Shor's algorithm for discrete log and factoring, that has a complexity of O(n 3 ) [21]. It however seems possible to build alternative public-key cryptographic schemes on problems that could resist polynomial cryptanalysis on a quantum computer, such as lattice shortest vector problem [22,23].…”
Section: Classical Public-key Cryptography and Secret Key Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, quantum computing has been hailed as the possible solution to some of the computationally hard classical problems [11]. Indeed, Grover's [7] and Shor's [12] algoritms provide such solutions to the problems of¯nding a given element in an unsorted set and the prime factorization of very large numbers, respectively. Here we present a solution to the continuous GOP in polynomial time, by developing a generalization of Grover's algorithm to continuous problems.…”
Section: Global Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%