1991
DOI: 10.1137/0220035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for Scheduling Imprecise Computations with Timing Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All jobs in H are scheduled within the ν intervals of set W A , and no job j ∈ H is scheduled outside the interval [r( j), d(j)]. This problem is essentially the same as the one discussed in Hochbaum and Shamir (1990, Section 2) (see also Shih et al 1991). This is called the problem of minimizing the unweighted number of tardy units, where the objective is to minimize the total (unweighted) compression (or tardy units) j∈H (b(j)− q( j)) instead of maximizing j∈H q(j).…”
Section: Solving Ssp On a Single Machinementioning
confidence: 75%
“…All jobs in H are scheduled within the ν intervals of set W A , and no job j ∈ H is scheduled outside the interval [r( j), d(j)]. This problem is essentially the same as the one discussed in Hochbaum and Shamir (1990, Section 2) (see also Shih et al 1991). This is called the problem of minimizing the unweighted number of tardy units, where the objective is to minimize the total (unweighted) compression (or tardy units) j∈H (b(j)− q( j)) instead of maximizing j∈H q(j).…”
Section: Solving Ssp On a Single Machinementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Their algorithm for the unweighted problem is of particular importance for this study, because we use its extended form as a subroutine in §5. Shih et al (1991) study the general case of 1 r j , p j =p j − x j pmtn C j ≤ d j w j x j and 1 r j p j =p j − x j pmtn C j ≤ d j x j with nonzero lower bounds on the processing times; the proposed algorithms have the same time complexity as those by Hochbaum and Shamir (1990). Notice that it is fairly easy to incorporate nonzero lower bounds if a network flow technique is used, whereas in an algorithm that relies on scheduling reasoning a move from zero lower bounds to nonzero ones requires additional effort.…”
Section: Review Of Scheduling With Fixed and Controllable Processing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be solved by algorithms developed by Hochbaum and Shamir (1990) and Shih et al (1991). In particular, the algorithm by Hochbaum and Shamir (1990) uses the UNION-FIND technique and guarantees that the actual processing times of all jobs and the corresponding optimal schedule are found in O h time, provided that the jobs are numbered in accordance with (26).…”
Section: Solving Single Machine Problem Via Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If processing time is not enough to produce high-quality results within the deadlines, there could be enough time for producing approximate results with a lower quality. This concept has been formalized by many authors Liu et al, 1987;Natarajan, 1995;Shih et al, 1991) and specific techniques have been developed for designing programs that can produce partial results.…”
Section: Service Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%