2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms for strong coupling procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
160
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second strategy considered so far consists in applying the Newton or the approximate-Newton method (the latter obtained by approximating the Jacobian) to the monolithic non-linear system (approximate-Newton-based algorithms). In [27], the author proposed a block-diagonal approximation of the Jacobian, leading to a partitioned algorithm where all the interface conditions and non-linearities are treated in the same loop (see also [36,28,33,13,48]). In [41], the authors considered alternative approximations of the Jacobian, leading to algorithms whose general structure consists in an external loop to manage the geometrical interface condition and the constitutive non-linearities and in an internal one to prescribe the physical interface conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second strategy considered so far consists in applying the Newton or the approximate-Newton method (the latter obtained by approximating the Jacobian) to the monolithic non-linear system (approximate-Newton-based algorithms). In [27], the author proposed a block-diagonal approximation of the Jacobian, leading to a partitioned algorithm where all the interface conditions and non-linearities are treated in the same loop (see also [36,28,33,13,48]). In [41], the authors considered alternative approximations of the Jacobian, leading to algorithms whose general structure consists in an external loop to manage the geometrical interface condition and the constitutive non-linearities and in an internal one to prescribe the physical interface conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algorithms without coupling iterations [23] and Gauss-Seidel iterations [1, 24,25] are mostly unstable in the case of strong interaction between the flow and the structure. However, quasi-Newton iterations [26,27] or Newton-Krylov techniques [28,29] can be used to solve such FSI problems in a partitioned way, even with black-box solvers. The main advantage of monolithic simulations is the stability of the solution process, whereas the most important benefit of the partitioned approach is that existing, mature and optimized codes for the subproblems can be reused.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For coupled fluid-structure interaction problems, the monolithic [38,65,20] and partitioned strategy [24,53,59,11,27,58,18,31,26,77] can be used. The monolithic approach is abandoned in favor of the partitioned approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen order of iterations, corresponds to the Block-Gauß-Seidel algorithm for fluid-structure interaction problem [58]. Let us note that not only the value at synchronization points T n or T n+1 , but also the interpolated evolution of variables have to be exchanged in the entire time-interval t ∈ [T n , T n+1 ] when the time steps are not matching between fluid and structure sub-problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%