2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-016-0104-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms generating images of attractors of generalized iterated function systems

Abstract: Abstract. The paper is devoted to searching algorithms which will allow to generate images of attractors of generalized iterated function systems (GIFS in short), which are certain generalization of classical iterated function systems, defined by Mihail and Miculescu in 2008, and then intensively investigated in the last years (the idea is that instead of selfmaps of a metric space X, we consider mappings form the Cartesian product X × ... × X to X).Two presented algorithms are counterparts of classical determ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of iterated function systems, IFS, to construct fractals was introduced by Hutchinson [12] in the decade 1980-1990, and later popularized by Barnsley [3]. Due to the applications of the fractals in many applied sciences (see, for instance, [7,8,14,29,36] and references therein), the IFS have been widely studied; see [2,6,11,13,15,[17][18][19][20]28,[30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introduction: Preliminary Definitions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of iterated function systems, IFS, to construct fractals was introduced by Hutchinson [12] in the decade 1980-1990, and later popularized by Barnsley [3]. Due to the applications of the fractals in many applied sciences (see, for instance, [7,8,14,29,36] and references therein), the IFS have been widely studied; see [2,6,11,13,15,[17][18][19][20]28,[30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introduction: Preliminary Definitions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…obtained by the updating rule (3). The first coordinates of D N , given by supp(M N +1 S (µ)) approximate the attractor set A S , and the second coordinates {v 1 , ..., v m }, gives the value at each point of the discrete probability M N S (µ) approximating the invariant probability µ S .…”
Section: The Hutchinson-barnsley Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deterministic one, where and initial set or measure is iterated by the respective operators approximating the attractor or the invariant measure w.r.t. the appropriated topology, see [1,2] for classical IFS and [3] for GIFS. The discrete one, is similar to the deterministic but an initial step is to introduce a discrete version of the space, an ε-net, and a discrete version of the operator, which is then iterated in the same fashion as the deterministic one producing a discrete set close to the attractor and a discrete measure which is close to the invariant one, [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFS is a representative system that can be used as a basis to simulate the scenery of a fractal nature to describe common fractal shapes, and its theory and practice have been widely applied in many fields. (11,12) As the shape of an ordinary IFS fractal attractor is very regular, the attractor often seems to be "rigid" and does not significantly change when the IFS attractor is directly used to simulate a natural landscape. Garcla introduced a mutually recursive function system (MRFS), a popular form of the IFS, to obtain a balance between order and chaos in the IFS attractor image.…”
Section: Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%