2005
DOI: 10.1080/00207160412331290667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Algorithms to solve the knapsack constrained maximum spanning tree problem

Abstract: The knapsack problem and the minimum spanning tree problem are both fundamental in operations research and computer science. We are concerned with a combination of these two problems. That is, we are given a knapsack of a fixed capacity, as well as an undirected graph where each edge is associated with profit and weight. The problem is to fill the knapsack with a feasible spanning tree such that the tree profit is maximized. We prove this problem NP-hard, present upper and lower bounds, develop a branch-and-bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The later articles from Xue [6] (weight-constrained MST ) and Jüttner [7] (constrained minimum cost spanning tree problem) deal with two similar primal-dual algorithms. Recently, Yamada et al [1] (KCMST problem) also described a LR approach, which yields feasible heuristic solutions, too. These are further improved by a 2-opt local search.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The later articles from Xue [6] (weight-constrained MST ) and Jüttner [7] (constrained minimum cost spanning tree problem) deal with two similar primal-dual algorithms. Recently, Yamada et al [1] (KCMST problem) also described a LR approach, which yields feasible heuristic solutions, too. These are further improved by a 2-opt local search.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, in the LR approach from [1,7] the knapsack constraint is relaxed and only the MST problem remains. This approach therefore fulfills the integrality property and, thus, is in general weaker than our LD.…”
Section: Strength Of the Lagrangian Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations